Eduard 1/32 - Bf-109E-4 'Weekend Edition'

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

jjp_nl

Staff Sergeant
845
3
Apr 13, 2011
The last few weeks have been typical for me when it comes to building. Enough projects already on the go, loads of ideas for these builds, good intentions to do some work on 'em…but for some reason I'm in a bit of deadlock when it comes to these builds…and then down the line I end up making serious progress on a kit I didn't even consider building until some other stuff was finished. So, with that said….I'm gonna throw another build at y'all for good measure.

A few weeks ago I purchased this large scale Eduard Bf-109E-4 Weekend Edition, but I didn't consider building it on such short notice….well, it turned out I was wrong. The kits has been a joy to build sofar, and progress was quite quick…let alone one or two small niggles.

I mostly build 1/48 fighters and 1/72 for the larger fighters and bombers, but I had been thinking about taking a little detour, and build a big scale kit. Why? Well it's a bit of a childhood thing I guess. My father used to be a pretty good model builder back in the day (that is until me and brother and three sisters came along) One of my earliest memories from when I was just a small lad was that I had two 1/32 scale a/c hanging on the ceiling of my bedroom. It was a 1/32 Bf-109E (Galland's kite) 'chased' by a 1/32 Spitfire MK.22/Mk.24. Both Matchbox kits I believe. I'm convinced these two kits worked their magic one way or the other and were instrumental in me discovering this fine hobby as well, and becoming the aviation nutter I am today. Therefore building a Bf-109E as a first big scale kit seemed like the natural thing to do for some reason.

Warning, I'm no member of the Messerschmitt Mafia, so if I missed a thing or two, or something isn't 100% hysterically correct… so be it. In other words a build according to the principle of "if it looks like a Bf-109 it probably is one". I've read that this Eduard kit is supposed to have one or two minor accuracy issues, but I didn't look into that really. If you feel a 109 should look 250% accurate....look the other way.

Preliminary conclusion of this build sofar:
- A very fine kit indeed. Comes together very quickly with little problemens for the most part
- Given the large scale detrail is a little sparse here and there (interior for the most part) This is ofcourse the result of the compromises of the Weekend Edition concept. On the other hand....experienced scratch builders should be able to take it to the next level without needing all the extra pre-fab bits and pieces that come with the Profi-Pack.
 

Attachments

  • 00 - dooske.jpg
    00 - dooske.jpg
    73.3 KB · Views: 547
  • 01 - interior 01.JPG
    01 - interior 01.JPG
    74.9 KB · Views: 539
  • 02 - interior 02.JPG
    02 - interior 02.JPG
    65.5 KB · Views: 475
  • 03 - interior 03.JPG
    03 - interior 03.JPG
    55.1 KB · Views: 455
  • 04 - interior 04.JPG
    04 - interior 04.JPG
    55.8 KB · Views: 548
  • 05 - interior 05.JPG
    05 - interior 05.JPG
    54.3 KB · Views: 444
  • 06 - flat black 01.JPG
    06 - flat black 01.JPG
    72.7 KB · Views: 565
  • 07 - flat black 02.JPG
    07 - flat black 02.JPG
    65.5 KB · Views: 431
  • 08 - flat black 03.JPG
    08 - flat black 03.JPG
    59 KB · Views: 449
  • 09 - RLM02 and gloss 01.JPG
    09 - RLM02 and gloss 01.JPG
    62 KB · Views: 457
  • 10 - RLM02 and gloss 02.JPG
    10 - RLM02 and gloss 02.JPG
    56.6 KB · Views: 424
  • 11 - RLM02 and gloss 03.JPG
    11 - RLM02 and gloss 03.JPG
    56.8 KB · Views: 428
  • 12 - RLM02 and gloss 04.JPG
    12 - RLM02 and gloss 04.JPG
    39.9 KB · Views: 447
  • 13 - office sub assembly.JPG
    13 - office sub assembly.JPG
    63.4 KB · Views: 505
  • 14 - side wall detail 01.JPG
    14 - side wall detail 01.JPG
    59.9 KB · Views: 418
  • 15 - side wall detail 02.JPG
    15 - side wall detail 02.JPG
    64 KB · Views: 429
  • 16 - IP detail.JPG
    16 - IP detail.JPG
    54 KB · Views: 432
  • 17 - fuselage halves glued.JPG
    17 - fuselage halves glued.JPG
    69.1 KB · Views: 419
  • 18 - added strength.JPG
    18 - added strength.JPG
    72 KB · Views: 414
  • 19 - cockpit rear bulkhead putty.JPG
    19 - cockpit rear bulkhead putty.JPG
    60.8 KB · Views: 633
  • 20 - cockpit rear bulkhead sanded.JPG
    20 - cockpit rear bulkhead sanded.JPG
    50.8 KB · Views: 591
  • 21 - interior in place.JPG
    21 - interior in place.JPG
    65.2 KB · Views: 585
  • 22 - wings glued.JPG
    22 - wings glued.JPG
    74.3 KB · Views: 430
  • 23 - wings glued to fuselage.JPG
    23 - wings glued to fuselage.JPG
    86.1 KB · Views: 546
  • 24 - overview 01.JPG
    24 - overview 01.JPG
    70.7 KB · Views: 478
  • 25 - poor wing to fuselage fit.JPG
    25 - poor wing to fuselage fit.JPG
    55.5 KB · Views: 557
  • 26 - streched sprue glued in gap.JPG
    26 - streched sprue glued in gap.JPG
    54.5 KB · Views: 609
  • 27 - putty on join.JPG
    27 - putty on join.JPG
    57.1 KB · Views: 593
  • 28 - Mr Surfacer on join.JPG
    28 - Mr Surfacer on join.JPG
    59.2 KB · Views: 475
  • 29 - poor fit oil cooler insert.JPG
    29 - poor fit oil cooler insert.JPG
    58.4 KB · Views: 524
  • 30 - cowling in place.JPG
    30 - cowling in place.JPG
    64.9 KB · Views: 440
  • 31 - additional cowling panels.JPG
    31 - additional cowling panels.JPG
    65 KB · Views: 548
  • 32 - angled back plate cockpit.JPG
    32 - angled back plate cockpit.JPG
    68.8 KB · Views: 418
  • 33 - under wing radiators.JPG
    33 - under wing radiators.JPG
    60.6 KB · Views: 420
  • 34 - cowling panels Mr Surfacers.JPG
    34 - cowling panels Mr Surfacers.JPG
    62.9 KB · Views: 424
  • 34 - overview 02 Emil alright.JPG
    34 - overview 02 Emil alright.JPG
    108.6 KB · Views: 534
  • 35 - wingtip 01.JPG
    35 - wingtip 01.JPG
    41.4 KB · Views: 452
  • 36 - wingtip 02.JPG
    36 - wingtip 02.JPG
    53.4 KB · Views: 424
  • 37 - wingtip 04.JPG
    37 - wingtip 04.JPG
    32.3 KB · Views: 424
  • 38 - wingtip 04.JPG
    38 - wingtip 04.JPG
    51.7 KB · Views: 431
  • 39 - preparation for painting.JPG
    39 - preparation for painting.JPG
    105.4 KB · Views: 540
  • 40 - pre-shade.JPG
    40 - pre-shade.JPG
    105 KB · Views: 553
  • 41 - RLM65_01.JPG
    41 - RLM65_01.JPG
    85.5 KB · Views: 526
  • 42 - RLM65_02.JPG
    42 - RLM65_02.JPG
    70.7 KB · Views: 389
  • 43 - vleugels afplakken.JPG
    43 - vleugels afplakken.JPG
    82.4 KB · Views: 420
  • 44 - RLM02 uit den losse polsch.jpg
    44 - RLM02 uit den losse polsch.jpg
    85.1 KB · Views: 434
  • 45 - splinters afplakkeren.JPG
    45 - splinters afplakkeren.JPG
    80.5 KB · Views: 549
  • 46 - met iets anders de splinter camo afmaken en uitpakken.JPG
    46 - met iets anders de splinter camo afmaken en uitpakken.JPG
    79.6 KB · Views: 451
  • 47 - splinters done 01.JPG
    47 - splinters done 01.JPG
    63.4 KB · Views: 439
  • 48 - splinters done 02.JPG
    48 - splinters done 02.JPG
    72.8 KB · Views: 787
Last edited:
Thanks guys! Another update for today. Went on to work on the remaining splinter camo on the upper fuselage. This ofcourse involved a little masking. Second step was to roughly spray the RLM02 patches using Revell Aqua #45, then another bit of masking to lay out the areas that needed to be dark green. Next step was spraying Revell Aqua #67 which is to my mind is pretty close to RLM71. I used a little piece of carefully placed blue tac (which is white here in NL BTW ;) ) to mask around the fin.

With RLM65 already on the entire fuselage prior to doing the spliter camo, the pre-shade is all but obliterated on the upper fuselage. But since I need to go back in to do some post shading and an odd touch up here and there I'll working something out to pick out the panel lines on the upper fuselage again.

Since this will be my first full blown Luftwaffe camouflage paint job I'm still thinking about how to approach the final step of this paint job, the little green stripes on the side of the fuselage. Will be most likely a free hand job, but I think a first couple of future coats to seal the paint work sofar might not be a bad idea. Should I mess up the striping, it can be hopefully touched up or even removed without wrecking the basic RLM02/RLM71 over RLM65 scheme.
 

Attachments

  • 49 - splinters fuselage 01.JPG
    49 - splinters fuselage 01.JPG
    92.5 KB · Views: 421
  • 50 - splinter fuselage 02.JPG
    50 - splinter fuselage 02.JPG
    66.5 KB · Views: 348
  • 51 - splinters fuselage 03.JPG
    51 - splinters fuselage 03.JPG
    99.4 KB · Views: 341
  • 52 - splinters fuselage 04.JPG
    52 - splinters fuselage 04.JPG
    90.3 KB · Views: 302
  • 53 - splinters fuselage 05.JPG
    53 - splinters fuselage 05.JPG
    93.9 KB · Views: 414
Last edited:
Some more work on this 109. Went on to work on the yellow wingtips and stabilizers, and also some post shading. Might seem a little over done right now, but my experience is that things even out pretty well once you go in with gloss coats and matt coats, so I'm not too worried about it.

Still need to do a little patch of yellow on the rudder, but the color call-out on the instructions for that area is botched so I sat there with my airbrush loaded with yellow..not knowing if it was the right tint. This a/c, according to the instructions, has two different tints of yellow on it, a much paler/lighter tint on the wingtips and stabilizers, and a more intense tint of yellow on the spinner. The profile drawings in the instructions however tell me to use one tint of yellow on one side of the rudder and the different tint on the other side...which seems a little odd to me. For some reason I've come across similar mistakes in the color call-outs that come with Eduard kits. Nothing too serious really...but it seems strange for a company who pays so much attention to detail and research into their subject.
 

Attachments

  • 55 - yellow 01.JPG
    55 - yellow 01.JPG
    85.1 KB · Views: 383
  • 56 - yellow 02.JPG
    56 - yellow 02.JPG
    75.5 KB · Views: 408
  • 57 - post shade 01.JPG
    57 - post shade 01.JPG
    100.8 KB · Views: 415
  • 58 - post shade 02.JPG
    58 - post shade 02.JPG
    96.7 KB · Views: 430
  • 59 - postshade 03.JPG
    59 - postshade 03.JPG
    83.5 KB · Views: 381
Last edited:
Seems odd to me too, all the recognition markings would have been applied at the same time so should be the same colour....can't possibly have run out to do one bit differently....
 
A difference between spinner and the rest could happen I guess (if that spinner color was part of some sort of earlier applied unit ID markings or whatever (dunno what was carried by JG.54 though during early to mid 1940) and the rest (wingtips/rudder/stabilizers) was added later on during the latter part of the battle of France and the early BoB, but two different colors on on the same area seems odd.
 
I can understand the spinner being slightly different, as this would probably be 04 paint, whereas the wing tips etc, as temporary tactical markings, being a 'washable', distemper-type paint, could be a slightly different tone. But can't see any reason or explanation for varied tones on these areas.
 
It's being mentioned as RLM04 and RLM27. I think I'm gonna go with the RLM27 (which is as far as I can tell the paler lighter shade of yellow) for the little patch on the rudder as well. Since this also seems to be part of the ID markings applied later on
 
Last edited:
So, a minor update for now. Managed to get the final patch of yellow on the rudder. Decided I'd got with what's on the rest of the a/c as well (the somewhat paler/lighter RLM27) and then make the spinner RLM04.

On the make preparations for a first few protective coats of future before I take the step to spray on the RLM71 stripe pattern on the sides.
 

Attachments

  • 61 - laatste hoekje geel 01.JPG
    61 - laatste hoekje geel 01.JPG
    89.9 KB · Views: 263
  • 62 - laatste hoekje geel 02.JPG
    62 - laatste hoekje geel 02.JPG
    76.2 KB · Views: 264

Users who are viewing this thread

Back