if we're talking about kill / death ratio, surely a german night fighter has to take gold.
problem is, history is whats been reported by those considerably removed from the concept of free or accurate speech due to agendas, so I'm thinking there are those little diamonds of truth forever...
just to throw my 2c into the fray, i always baulk at Best Fighter! comparisons as just so much staggeringly relevant variables come into play.
at a glance, i consider the following directly produce a result:
fuel consumption, in all scenarios including range, meaning time in and between...
what annoyed me today?
a news story of 4 women, spurned lovers of one man, exacted revenge by luring him with help of his wife to a hotel room where he was held, tortured and bashed.
the news treated it like a right laugh due to a male victim. Mentioned the hell hath no fury cliche. Hill...
i dont understand why absolutes are always referred to when describing a planes value.
i understand the Ki-100 was well armed, agile and had a reasonable turn of speed.
when i see max performance figures quoted, i always wonder how many combats occurred at those top speeds..... and how...
"CF100 or CF101"
was that the uber canadian fighter for its day...?
i seem to recall a jet fighter Canada had that well suited its long range reqs and such.