Because I doubt it would have changed anything
blitzkrieg was a spectacularly successful war model across uninterrupted expanses of land. It flattened a France that no-one in Germany, in their right mind, would have even considered invading in 1938.
Longer-ranged bombers and fighters to...
No, you're quite right
let's face it, Germany did lose the war :)
but notwithstanding the increasingly short supply of fuel and the territorial gains being made by the Allies, the Nachtjagd had become extremely efficient at destroying bombers at night.
This is how I understood it
as the conflict progressed into late-war, RAF losses at night began to mirror USAAF losses by day prior to effective long-range escort. Mosquito nightfighters didn't seem to be that good at picking out the Luftwaffe machines, relying more on the plume provided by a...
I hope you're not planning to continue like this. Your contributions to threads are often glib, lacking depth, data, insight or thought provocation and sometimes relevance, contributing little or nothing of value to the debate, you were merely asked to present your credentials, which to date you...
I'm sure this topic's come up before
I would imagine some of the Lancaster's payload advantage would need to be traded in when it gunned up - I wouldn't be surprised to see the addition of waist and Sperry ventral positions. Trying to fend off Sturmbock assault waves with .303 would be...
They're impressive
If you recall the Tesla that Top Gear showed a couple of years ago, it got up to 60mph in a sub-4 second time, they've got impressive torque. It stuffed the petrol-driven car in the drag race, though I can't recall what the petrol-driven car was, it was no slouch.
Not much...