Hi Denmark219
Sorry for the late reply, just stumbled upon this again.
Yeah, here is my 23E50/6477A-0 3D model. I own a 6477A-0 blade and used photogrametry ( 3d scan from a myriads of photos all around ) to depict a global template and use it to rebuilt a blade from scratch. Very accurate.
Hi dude
I'm a Propeller lover... love to 3D model these ones.
Don't have the original building technical drawings ( and honestly after years of researches, not sure anyone still have them, and UTC Aerospace is not keen to help )
But I do own a 6477A-0 blade that I scanned with photogrametry...
Hi derekbu
Such informations doesn't actually exist. I mean they are, but so proprietary no one but required engineers and machinist can access them.
I also model various blades, but have to trust photos and photogrammetry to reach my goals.
Good luck :-P
What's the point of this repetition ?
No, if you took the time to read just above messages from Shortround and myself, you'd see 23E50 means nothing but the hub design.
To reply the original poster : Your answer is in F6F-3/-5 PoH, you probably can download PDF for a low cost on Avialog...
Yup, thanks for detailing even further.
Still we don't have the final answer, and comparing nowadays blades on both planes doesn't mean
anything as many were suitanle but not originally designed for ( ex of current Yaks with Hamilton Std props )
Hello,
Sorry to up this topic so late, but just for clarification :
A constant speed variable pitch propeller is a comibination of blades and Hub, and are so designated as such. There is not a single designation number for the whole propeller, but one for blades and another for the hub.
6507A...