Recent content by krieghund

  1. krieghund

    Which of these DB 601 powered fighters was the best? Bf 109F-2, Ki-61-I or C.202

    I realize that this is for the F-4 but it should be in the ballpark for the 601N engine and should give a good approximation of what can be expected of the F-2. If one cruises at 0.65 ata at 7km you have about 265 liters of fuel available to you after warm-up and taxi/take-off, and fuel to...
  2. krieghund

    F8F Bearcat rate of climb

    Greg I posted the FM here since 2007: http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/other-mechanical-systems-tech/f8f-bearcat-8251.html#post252299 Here is the engine portions of the manual
  3. krieghund

    F8F Bearcat rate of climb

    Here is some more info on the Sea Hornet and Hornet Mk1
  4. krieghund

    WWII Engine Boost Units

    Here is a TAIC cheat chart for those that don't want to do the math. further discussions are here: http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/engines/ata-inches-hg-26858.html
  5. krieghund

    F8F Bearcat rate of climb

    Here is the Take-off, climb and landing chart from the FM Sorry it is a bit blurry. Also remember that the climb is usually scheduled at Military Power and not WEP.
  6. krieghund

    F8F Bearcat rate of climb

    The F8F manual I posted a while back is here: http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/other-mechanical-systems-tech/manual-index-american-36322.html and also some USN charts of the F8F-1 and -2. Enjoy
  7. krieghund

    ju 390 disappears with out a trace

    I'm just waiting for six BMW-801's to show up for sale on ebay from Uruguay!!!
  8. krieghund

    Merlin or Griffon powered M.B.3

    I think the historical route was correct to move to the MB5 and the Griffon
  9. krieghund

    P-39 Performance Thread

    I thought this would be the right spot for these documents. Enjoy!
  10. krieghund

    could the Allison engine have done what the Rolls Royce Merlin did?

    Kind of looks sexy
  11. krieghund

    SHOULD the P39 have been able to handle the Zero? Was it training or performance?

    Here's the charts for the P-39D with two engine options
  12. krieghund

    SHOULD the P39 have been able to handle the Zero? Was it training or performance?

    Is there something that indicates the altitudes are with or without RAM?
  13. krieghund

    SHOULD the P39 have been able to handle the Zero? Was it training or performance?

    Would you have a source that has the correct information?
  14. krieghund

    SHOULD the P39 have been able to handle the Zero? Was it training or performance?

    Here's a comparison of the engine charts from the flight manuals. The military power recommended duration on the V1710 is 15 minutes and the V1650 is 5 minutes. A clear advantage of the V1650 in military is an increase in critical altitude by over 6000 feet. Of course the V1710 is the without...
  15. krieghund

    SHOULD the P39 have been able to handle the Zero? Was it training or performance?

    Well climb and speed are only a few of the factors involved in determining maneuverability. It would appear at face value that the P-39 has the advantage but I would suspect the F4F is the more nimble due to a lower wing loading and able to easily out turn the P-39. The P-39 probably bleeds...
Back