Recent content by lonestarman63

  1. lonestarman63

    p51 vs p47

    seems folks forget about jets that take longer runways and they were there ? and yes 51 they could ground strike but why use them for that unless you just wish to find what a bullet does to the cooling system .fact is the mustang was a bad turn fighter. just there were so many of them ,so the...
  2. lonestarman63

    what is this? help

    This Photo was aquired by myself in Berlin, at Charlottenburg Flea Market, (West) FRG IN 1977. I Am not an Aviation expert. This photo has spawned many a debate. I would like to invite any correspondence refereance this Photo
  3. lonestarman63

    Favorite fighter/interceptor?

    Ain't she just cool too look , i mean if you knew nothen about aircraft and walk about and found one of these you wold have to say she is a predator with only on job in life :twisted:
  4. lonestarman63

    p51 vs p47

    alway think the 47 is a better aircraft for many reasons, but most of all , It is one tuff bird
  5. lonestarman63

    Which side arm?

    S F C Angelford was my old friend in the Army , told me when we they were just talking about the 9 mm as a replacement to the 1911 A1 he jokenly said the biggest diff between 9 mm and the ole 1911 was with 9 mm shoot at a truck , you had to hit the driver in...
  6. lonestarman63

    B-17, B-24, or Lancaster

    they were phased out because of range ,not saying were not , i was talking about the ETO 8)
  7. lonestarman63

    B-17, B-24, or Lancaster

    they were used in the pacific early on till late 42:rolleyes:
  8. lonestarman63

    B-17, B-24, or Lancaster

    1)That was just in the Us before they got to operations 2)904 airmen was the highest of any Us aircraft . 3) $60,000,000 is stil a lot of resoures no matter how you slice it 4) we were talking about ETO8)
  9. lonestarman63

    B-17, B-24, or Lancaster

    8) The b 17 easier to maintain and there for more available for combat The b 17 spent half as much time in the modification centers thus read for action in shorter time b 17 combat sorties versus the b24,results in 40 % savings in personnel and material Statistcal comparisons done at loss...
  10. lonestarman63

    B-17, B-24, or Lancaster

    USA, AAF Chief Unit Traing Division , Assistant Cheif of Staff. Training . Letter to AC/AS Training dated 13 NOV 1944 The b 24 was the most extravagant killer of any airplane AAF from pearl to sept of 44 the b 24 accdents in the US resulted in 2188 deaths in the first 9 months of 1944 b24 did...
  11. lonestarman63

    B-17, B-24, or Lancaster

    The real night and day comes from the B 17 and the B 24 can compare that , and as i study and read the b 17 was by far the better warbird some of the reasons , i think are worth looking at. The b 17 easier to maintain and there for more available for combat The b 17 spent half as much time...
  12. lonestarman63

    B-17, B-24, or Lancaster

    :confused: Statistcal comparisons done at loss rate per sortie shows that the b 17 had a 35 % longer combat life than the b 24 The b 24 was the most extravagant killer of any airplane AAF from pearl to sept of 44 the b 24 accdents in the US resulted in 2188 deaths in the first 9 months of...
  13. lonestarman63

    B-17, B-24, or Lancaster

    meaning the b 24 cost so much before it even saw action between the cost to get it ready and loss's in training and all it :) was better for the axis powers
  14. lonestarman63

    Most Beautiful Aircraft

    T:D :D hink it the best looking of all aircraft
  15. lonestarman63

    B-17, B-24, or Lancaster

    because if we built more it would have cost so much more in men supplys and time , so i do not even no why the b 24 is here with the 17 or the lanc :?:
Back