Recent content by Procrastintor

  1. Procrastintor

    The What is it? Game

    It's a bomber nailed it
  2. Procrastintor

    Least favorite WW II aircraft manufacturer?

    It's OK Curtiss, he didn't mean it.
  3. Procrastintor

    The What is it? Game

    Oh, if just have to guess like that, I think it's a plane! If we're getting super-specific, it's prop-driven.
  4. Procrastintor

    The What is it? Game

    Is it a Sukhoi SU 27? EDIT: SU 26 lol, NOOOT the same thing
  5. Procrastintor

    The What is it? Game

    You sneaky baste'd you, showing the two planes close up like they're one aircraft.
  6. Procrastintor

    Ground crew complement

    Flyboy, when I say more complex I just mean more engineering-per-inch, if you will, it seems like the armorer for example, would have to work harder, just due to the fact that some variants had 3 different types of guns, with one firing through the engine. I imagined it was like an Audi compared...
  7. Procrastintor

    The What is it? Game

    Let's see, one corner of the USSR star, that's a... STAR-t. Got that out of the way, now, it doesn't look pre-war, which is odd for a 3-engine. Though I'm probably wrong lol.
  8. Procrastintor

    Bf-109 vs Spitfire vs Fw-190 vs P-51

    $425 for a used book? Anyone want to just type it here? XD (I was kidding, but if you did I'd read it. Just saying)
  9. Procrastintor

    Ground crew complement

    Hey, you guys seem like you might know, what kind of ground crew were required for German fighters, (primarily BF 109 and FW 190)? They seem like they'd need higher maintenance, not saying that they weren't durable, just that they were complex.
  10. Procrastintor

    Three reasons why the P-40 was a better fighter in the PTO than the Spitfire

    I agree with pattle, the Warhawk was definitely more useful, but generally not a better 'fighter'. *Looks at signature and profile picture* EDIT: I realize I may be slightly biased.
  11. Procrastintor

    USAAF ignores wars lessons

    Why would you scrap the Warthogs? Those things are worth the cost for psychological warfare alone, and I doubt the Lightning II will cut it, the worse armament and low-speed-stability will mean that you'll need more planes doing more attack runs on the same target for the same effect. Plus A-10s...
  12. Procrastintor

    Galveston Gal Down

    Da*n, is there any news on how it happened?
  13. Procrastintor

    p40s and mustangs on carriers

    Those Warhawk pictures are pretty interesting, never knew they were operated off of carriers at any point.
  14. Procrastintor

    Visually, which one of these two ww2 fighters would you say is your favourite?

    P-47 IMO, that plane just looked tough, and it lived up to that look. Also, are you doing full size? If so what kind of engine do you plan on using? (original??)
  15. Procrastintor

    could u slide an airplane sideways

    A few degrees at lowish speed, but it does NOT look like a drift or powerslide in a car, you could also go into a flat spin and loudly become one with the ground ;). And at higher speeds the tail can fall apart (or off) So its not advised if you are at 350+ MPH, and likely not even possible...
Back