It was a tough choice between the P-51 and the P-47 for me. The P-51 was known as one of the best fighters ever, but the P-47 was very tough, and with 8 .50 cal machine guns, it could definately kill. I did end up voting for the P-51.
It was a good movie, entertaining, but as many of you have said, it had incorrect information. The closest thing to losing a bomber only came when Me-262s came, and a B-17 lost 1 engine. I also noticed that there were no Fw-190s, or B-24s.
Yes, but George Lucas also said he was retiring.
George Lucas retiring from blockbusters after 'Red Tails?' | al.com
And I saw the movie yesterday,and for anyone who hasn't seen it, this could spoil it,but it did add to the legend of them never losing a bomber.
Thank you Njaco, I think we should get back on track. You can go to the thread: http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/aviation/spitfire-v-me109-i-have-found-these-links-net-29431.html to talk about the Me 109 and Spitfire.
I wasn't sure where to put this, but what are people thinking about the new movie about the Tuskegee Airmen?
Red Tails
RedTailsMovie's Channel - YouTube
The Tuskegee Airmen were great at protecting the bombers, but they couldn't keep everything off the heavies. In one trailer someone says...
I love the B-17, it's my 2nd favorite plane. The 17 also was very tough, I once saw a picture that had a story to go with it, and it was a pic of a B-17, flying over England, with a completely destroyed tail, and the crew was waving to people as they passed by.
And the B-24 was faster (300...
Which one is better, the gun or the missile? With the gun, you get exciting dogfights, but with a missile, you can pretty much just sit and pull the trigger. Guns have a shorter range, and can jam, but a pilot once said, "I fired two missiles, because they're called missiles, not hittiles*".8)...