Recent content by Titus70

Thank you for your discussion input Adler and Erich re the FW190. Also appreciate the tips and suggestions from RG_Lunatic re: http://www.virtualpilots.fi/feature/articles/109myths/#myths regarding use of links and quotes. The paste feature saves a lot of typing; but sure, I will try...

Hi KrazyKanuck, Thanks for pointing that out. You're correct. The Focke-Wulf was developed early. My point to Adler was that heavy Allied bombing campaign was having such a major impact that "developing" i.e. putting the Focke Wulf and variants into large scale production to strategically...

Hello everyone. Thank you for input and comments. I've found an interesting (and I think credible!) site from Finland, at web address: :arrow: http://www.virtualpilots.fi/feature/articles/109myths/#myths It provides a fairly comprehensive article titled: 'Messerschmitt 109 -...

Hello Adler (Eagle), Yes I agree with your comments about the Focke Wulf. It was one hell of a good fighter. Both the short (snub) nose and the long nose versions. The reason I chose the Messerschmitt was because of sheer overall produced numbers/ availability. I think the Focke Wulf was...

Hi KrazyKanuk, it's me Titus70 I've read your comments. You appear to have misread the article from aeroscientists.org which I submitted. I copied and pasted the article 'Secrets of the Messerschmitt Me109' onto this forum, direct from it's website address, and in doing so it appears...

this article is from: www.aeroscientists.org/aircraft.html it reads..... The P-51 Mustang and the Spitfire are often thought of as the best fighters of WWII. They were not. The Me109 was much better and here are its secrets! Statistic: Year---German aircraft lost---British aircraft...