Look bro keep in mind that I said that I'm new at this. My knowledge on WW2 is so far only limited to what I have read on textbooks and things here and there around the web. That's why I specifically asked does it make a difference. If I'm wrong about something feel free to correct me. The only...
Ok just to get one thing clear I'm well aware its due to the military staff that the Nazis were so successful. I might be new at this but I'm not ignorant enough to think that a leader himself is single-handedly responsible for all its military conquests.
The point I'm trying to make which...
Good point. From what I hear Germans and Italians were providing the Japanese with a fair amount of supply as well. Would it have made dent to Japan if that had stopped? Where did these two countries stand anyways as far as overall resources is concerned?
Never said he was a good strategist to be honest just don't think he was a bad one. I just don't believe you can conquer most of Europe by being a terrible military strategist. And he would have had to play his part in that.
Besides in comparison to his group are the Japanese really any better...
As horrible a person as he was don't think you can say Hitler was a bad military strategist which is all that would matter here I would think. Plus the doesn't the u-boats and air force give Germany an edge there?
Which gets me to the topic that doesn't seem like it has been touched yet. How...
I've recently started to develop a lot of interest in WW2 and this question keeps pooping up into my head. So I did a google search and mostly everything that pops up usually turns into a dick waving "this country was better than this country" BS that are just dire to read. So I was looking for...