A question concerning aerial refuelling.

Discussion in 'Modern' started by Nonskimmer, Mar 10, 2005.

  1. Nonskimmer

    Nonskimmer Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2004
    Messages:
    8,848
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Occupation:
    Naval Electronics Technician
    Location:
    Halifax, Nova Scotia
    I've often wondered, and have never really found a satisfactory answer, as to why the US Air Force uses the exact opposite refuelling probe arrangement on it's aircraft from the Navy and Marine Corps.

    The Air Force has the probe on the tanker, with the receiving aircraft having the "female" connection. The Navy/Marine tankers release a drogue to the probe on the receiving aircraft.

    Is there an actual reason for this difference, or does the Air Force just like being difficult? ;)
    I'm just curious.
     
  2. Nonskimmer

    Nonskimmer Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2004
    Messages:
    8,848
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Occupation:
    Naval Electronics Technician
    Location:
    Halifax, Nova Scotia
    Answer me!! :shock:


    ;)
     
  3. Maestro

    Maestro Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2004
    Messages:
    2,890
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Occupation:
    Security Officer
    Location:
    Beaupré, Province of Québec, Canada
    I think you asked a question about a mystery of life... no one got an answer ! :lol:
     
  4. evangilder

    evangilder "Shooter"
    Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2004
    Messages:
    19,419
    Likes Received:
    137
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Network Engineer/Photographer
    Location:
    Moorpark, CA
    Home Page:
    I wondered about that myself years ago, especially after Operation El Dorado Canyon, of which I took part. It was a joint AF/Navy operation that required each to provide their own tankers. I will have to see if I can find out if anyone at the museum knows any "gas passers". It is indeed a mystery...
     
  5. the lancaster kicks ass

    the lancaster kicks ass Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,980
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    sounds very interesting.........
     
  6. DerAdlerIstGelandet

    DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crew Chief
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    41,768
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    A&P - Aircraft Technician
    Location:
    USA/Germany
    To be honest I really dont know, but I would say it is because in tradition the US military can not agree on anything whether it is uniforms, equipment or aireal refueling.

    The best guess that I can come up with is this. The Airforce uses large tankers such as the KC-135 which can carry more fuel in it because the fuel is carried in the fuselage. For this reason it uses a rigid fueling boom. It is easier to attach a rigid fueling boom to an aircraft if the boom has the male part and the aircraft has the female part. The KC-135 can not land on a carrier adn the Navy and Marine Corps needs refuelers that can take off from there carrier. The aircraft are too small to carry the fuel in the fusalage so most of the time the fuel is carried in external tanks. You can not attach a rigid boom to an external tank. It is therefore that a flexible hose is extended with a female part and the aircraft with the male part "penetrates" the hose. Like my terminology there! :lol:
    In all actuallity though all Airforce tankers are equipped with a flexible hose that has the female attachement so that Navy and Marine aircraft can refuel from it also.
     
  7. Nonskimmer

    Nonskimmer Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2004
    Messages:
    8,848
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Occupation:
    Naval Electronics Technician
    Location:
    Halifax, Nova Scotia
    So then, the original question still stands. ;)
     
  8. MikeMan

    MikeMan Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2005
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    It probably has to do with fuel flow rates.

    The airforce needs to be able to re-fuel Bomber/Transport/VIP planes with large offloads that would take forever through a hose a drouge but the higher flow of a boom makes it easier.
     
  9. DerAdlerIstGelandet

    DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crew Chief
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    41,768
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    A&P - Aircraft Technician
    Location:
    USA/Germany
    I talked to some people that used to fly for the navy and they did say that it was not the only reason but one of the reasons was the fact that none of the naval carrier refuelers could operate a boom because the aircraft were too small. They did not know the actual main reason though, and they did confirm that they did refuel from Airforce tankers also.
     
  10. the lancaster kicks ass

    the lancaster kicks ass Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,980
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    so i think it's solved then........
     
  11. Nonskimmer

    Nonskimmer Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2004
    Messages:
    8,848
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Occupation:
    Naval Electronics Technician
    Location:
    Halifax, Nova Scotia
    Hmmm, that could be.
     
  12. DerAdlerIstGelandet

    DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crew Chief
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    41,768
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    A&P - Aircraft Technician
    Location:
    USA/Germany
    Well Ill be damned!
     
  13. FLYBOYJ

    FLYBOYJ "THE GREAT GAZOO"
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2005
    Messages:
    23,200
    Likes Received:
    786
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Aircraft Maintenance Manager/ Flight Instructor
    Location:
    Colorado, USA
    The refueling boom is actually a "spec" part and only certain companies can legally produce it. There was also an attempt to put a Boeing Boom on an Airbus by BAE, but Boeing quickly protested when they learned of this plan. It is true that the drogue system takes up the least amount of space. BAE Flight Systems of Mojave CA produced a "Bolt On" Drogue system made to go on 707s - Instant Tanker!

    Go to http://www.sargentfletcher.com/ars.htm and you could read about the company that makes these units

    :tomcat:
     
  14. Nonskimmer

    Nonskimmer Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2004
    Messages:
    8,848
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Occupation:
    Naval Electronics Technician
    Location:
    Halifax, Nova Scotia
    Interesting. Thanks.
     
  15. DerAdlerIstGelandet

    DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crew Chief
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    41,768
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    A&P - Aircraft Technician
    Location:
    USA/Germany
  16. FLYBOYJ

    FLYBOYJ "THE GREAT GAZOO"
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2005
    Messages:
    23,200
    Likes Received:
    786
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Aircraft Maintenance Manager/ Flight Instructor
    Location:
    Colorado, USA
    The company currently operating this aircraft is called Omega - here's their web site.

    This mod was a nightnare to do - almost a year behind schedule!

    Check out thier website http://www.fuelbirds.com/
     
  17. DerAdlerIstGelandet

    DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crew Chief
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    41,768
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    A&P - Aircraft Technician
    Location:
    USA/Germany
    I can believe it was.
     
  18. FLYBOYJ

    FLYBOYJ "THE GREAT GAZOO"
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2005
    Messages:
    23,200
    Likes Received:
    786
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Aircraft Maintenance Manager/ Flight Instructor
    Location:
    Colorado, USA
    What was funny was many of the engineers who designed the system didn't have a clue how to modify the airpane so the system could be installed :rolleyes:
     
  19. DerAdlerIstGelandet

    DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crew Chief
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    41,768
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    A&P - Aircraft Technician
    Location:
    USA/Germany
    That almost sounds like the mechanics who work on our aircraft.
     
  20. FLYBOYJ

    FLYBOYJ "THE GREAT GAZOO"
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2005
    Messages:
    23,200
    Likes Received:
    786
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Aircraft Maintenance Manager/ Flight Instructor
    Location:
    Colorado, USA
    What type of aircraft?
     
Loading...

Share This Page