AI Fails (2 Viewers)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

If I may point out, the two seemingly three engine planes are actually four engined. See the fourth engine is nose mounted. Avery must read many of the wonderwaffen designs or is familiar with French prototypes. The four engines appear to jets. Veeery Interesting.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
These people need to be tied to the back of a tank and taken for a drag across very rough ground !

Seriously, we may laugh at it now, but people who are not familiar with this, and other subjects, particularly youngsters, now and in the future, could and very possibly would believe that what is presented in these massive piles of shite is fact.
 

All the AI cheerleaders forget that GIGO is GIGO no matter who is looking up the bullshit internet info, human or AI.

At least a human may have the sensibility to say, "Wait, that doesn't look right" and then dig some more. AI is shit.

I commented on Paul Woodadge's WW2TV last week when one of his guests used an AI-cobbled image of a German general. Paul pushed back, saying "this is the way it's going to be, may as well get used to it" (paraphrasing there), and I vigorously disagree. Historians traffic in facts, and simply bowing to inevitable invention to cover gaps in our resources is bullshit.

Nothing wrong with the pic, but this idea of credentialed historians using AI scares the hell out of me and I think it should be stopped. And that falls upon us, the readership/viewership.
 
Last edited:
Dare I point out that these are all from the same "author" (a term i use very loosely here) - this person needs to be called out.
 

Users who are viewing this thread