Best all-round fighter of WWII

Best all-round dogfighter of WWII?

  • Total voters
    78

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

For overall performance, I would vote for the 190 or the Spit. However, the Corsair wasn't at very much of a disadvantage and could do it all from a flight deck with no land in miles.

Corsair.
 
wuzak said:
And I would still rather have a Spitfire XIV over a P-51 at 30,000ft.
Click to expand...
provided you are dogfighting within 50 miles of aerodrome , I did a little test and used Google earth and drew an operational range circle around , try it with an area your familiar with , for Australia the Spit would have trouble going between Melbourne and Sydney and have proper reserves without refuelling
 
Last edited:
Have to vote for the Corsair. Fast as a thief, maneuverable, able to take a beating and dish it out. Equally adapt at mixing it up in a furball or killin' crunchies. Plus no water cooled engine that takes a dive after one hit.
 
deployment of the F4 to the ETO would have helped, but it didnt so we will never know how well or not it would have stacked up against the luftwaffe!
 
Didn't vote. Can't really vote without knowing the WHAT IS EXPECTED of this so called best. What is the maximum altitude it must be able to perform at? If the minimum altitude that this fighter must be able to reach is set at 40,000ft. That eliminates the Zero and Yak-3. If it must be able to fly at least 2,000 mls. That eliminates all but the P-38, P-51 and P-47. I think the F4U could be modified to fly that distance. At 2,000 mls. minimum you better add the P-63 to that list. Is a minimum load carrying ability going to be required? Say 1,500 lbs. That would knock about everything but the US aircraft off that list. Or does this A/C have to be able to reach 20,000ft. in around 5 minutes and 30,000ft. in less than 11 minutes? Wow, you can kiss over half that list goodby. My point is, you can't pick a best unless you have minimum levels of performance that will be expected of this fighter in order for this so called best to fill the needs that will be required of it. Of course, that is just my opinion.
 
It was a tough choice between the P-51 and the P-47 for me. The P-51 was known as one of the best fighters ever, but the P-47 was very tough, and with 8 .50 cal machine guns, it could definately kill. I did end up voting for the P-51.
 
NiceShotAustin said:
I don't know too much about Spits so I have no idea as to whether or not I'd fly a Mk XIV over a P-51 at those altitudes
Click to expand...

Which illustrates the problem with these polls. Too many variables. Above 30.000ft I'd take a Ta152!
I might not have the range to make it to the fight though.
I haven't voted
Steve
 
My best dogfighter would be Spit IV - and best all-around fighter P47, possibly 190. P-51 - jack of all trades, master of none.
 
I voted for the T-bolt. With proper drop tanks it had good range. And in the M and N models this was even better. It had exceptional firepower. With the air cooled radial and great construction it could and did take a great pounding and still could make it home, and this made it a better ground attack machine also. It could carry two 1,000 pound bombs or rockets. Most of the time it was loaded with 500 pounders. The Corsair would be my second pick.
 
I am (and well known for this) a passionate advocate of the Mustang (B/C/D/K/H) strategic importance. Having siad that the US could have picked one fighter and it would have served well in every thretre, for every serice, for every role - and I chose the F4U. Nothing else in the US arsenal could have served everay role with few detractions and many superlatives as this big ungainly heavy ugly superb cost effective multi role beast.

The LW did not want any part of this SOB in the ETO or MTO.
 
Corsairs were used above Norway, eg. as escorts in the sorties by Barracudas vs. Tirpitz.
 
No combat was seen by Corsairs in the ETO although it was used on a few escort missions. A shame since it would have acquited itself well. If Marshall had not had an extreme bias against the Marine Corps the Corsair might have been used against V1 sites off of CVEs. I second drgondog's post strongly.
 
The Fw 190D-13 had hydraulically boosted ailerons just as the P-38L improving upon its already impressive rate of roll.
 
cimmex said:
never heard of this, do you have a source?
cimmex
Click to expand...

Not directly, but there are several sources, also on this forum, who state this since the two remaining Doras (D-9 and D-13) in the US had their respective wings interchanged for a long time before that was corrected. They then found out that the D-13 has boosted ailerons. One has to look a little bit at the search function of this forum or google it. It's also stated on wikipedia (I know it's not the most reliable of sources).
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Similar threads

The last dogfight of WWII
Replies
5
Views
2K
Gnomey
S
"Generations" of fighter aircraft
2
Replies
32
Views
6K
Barrett
B
S
Wing shapes of Russian fighters
Replies
14
Views
701
bf109xxl
S
Allied Bombers and Fighter Bombers in 1942:, North Africa, China, Burma, Pacific, Aleutians
2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
Steamed_Banana
S
A
How did the I-16 Really Perform in WWII?
3 4 5
Replies
80
Views
4K
Airborne2001
A
Menu
Log in
Register