Bombing of Toyko

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Negative Creep

Staff Sergeant
877
13
Apr 1, 2007
New Zealand
Bought a book on this recently and something occurred to me. In the firebombing raids of 1945, why was the Imperial Palace not targeted? It had a map of the affected areas with the palace grounds just outside and the aiming points well off. Wouldn't destroying this have a massive effect on civilian morale and will to fight? Since the book doesn't say either way, was not bombing it a concious decision for US High Command?
 
One could hypothesise
by 1945 Hirohito wanted the war over and an end to civilian casualties, his military chiefs wanted to fight to the last man. Even with the second bomb on Nagasaki his military council were tied in a vote over whether or not to surrender. Hirohito intervened and broke the tie in favour of surrender.

Hirohito was regarded as divine in the eyes of the Japanese people, surrender would be taken in various degrees of consternation ranging from relief, to grief to suicide; whichever view was taken however, they would cease hostilities if told to do so by the Emperor.

One could surmise that Allied intelligence were aware of this and that killing him and leaving his hard-line military council to prosecute the remainder of the war could have proved very costly indeed wrt to an invasion of the Japanese mainland.
 
Yes, I think Colin1's opinion gets to the point too.
No emperor, no rules. Only going into chaos and finally to the communism.
 
In "Mission With LeMay" there is no comment by LeMay regarding avoiding the Palace per se.

I know thousands of Japanese were estimated to have boiled alive in the moat because the temperatures were high around the Palace and the damage extended to the moat. IMHO there is no way the mission planners could have purposefully avoided the Imperial Palace given the nature of the strikes and the varied approaches and altitudes by individual flights at night.

As a 3-5 yr old kid in Japan I have a lot of memories of the destruction even three years after the war ended.

I do know that the primary targets were the cottage manufacturing plants distributed throughout Tokyo
 
They didn't go after Hirohito in 1945 for the same reason they didn't go after him in 1942, he was considered a living God and to attack (or kill) him would just make the chances of ending the war that much less likely.

As a figurehead, he was useful to a conquering force.
As a dead figurehead, he would become a rallypoint for ultanationalist.
 
I also agree with Colin. Whether or not we were aware of it at the time, Hirohito was the voice of reason. When the people heard his voice on the radio on August 15, the war was over.

TO
 
When Doolittle raided Tokyo in 1942, he instructed his pilots not to target the palace. I can't remember the reason, but he was adamant about leaving it alone.
 
does anyone have hard evidence that LeMay ordered the strike force to 'avoid' the Palace? And, if so, anyone have a clue how the force could assume that the firestorm would not run over it?
 
I do know that the primary targets were the cottage manufacturing plants distributed throughout Tokyo
They were indeed after the machine-shops in Shitamachi, the two wards of Honjo and Fukagawa on the east side of the Sumida were teeming with small merchant enterprises or 'shadow factories'.

The thing with the night of the raid in question is that it was clear skies with scattered clouds, visibility was initially 'better than ten miles'. The two pathfinder B-29s put their 'flaming X' smack in the heart of the target area. A further ten B-29s followed up and the aerial armada that was the main force (-2 and -10 would leave 322 B-29s) followed that.

XXI Bomber Command HQ received the message "Bombing the target visually. Large fires observed. Flak moderate. Fighter opposition nil." It was as close to a precision strike as you were going to get with carpet-bombing technology.

The B-29s weren't flying within normal formation constraints, that is true (they were also bereft of gunner stations bar the tail gunner) but given the flying conditions and the superb job done by the pathfinders as a result, they couldn't miss.

I would agree with you that there were strong, technical reasons why the Imperial Palace avoided the firestorm but one does get the impression that there were political constraints at work. Tokyo wasn't even in the top 5 on Groves' list for a nuclear strike.
 
They were indeed after the machine-shops in Shitamachi, the two wards of Honjo and Fukagawa on the east side of the Sumida were teeming with small merchant enterprises or 'shadow factories'.

The thing with the night of the raid in question is that it was clear skies with scattered clouds, visibility was initially 'better than ten miles'. The two pathfinder B-29s put their 'flaming X' smack in the heart of the target area. A further ten B-29s followed up and the aerial armada that was the main force (-2 and -10 would leave 322 B-29s) followed that.

XXI Bomber Command HQ received the message "Bombing the target visually. Large fires observed. Flak moderate. Fighter opposition nil." It was as close to a precision strike as you were going to get with carpet-bombing technology.

The B-29s weren't flying within normal formation constraints, that is true (they were also bereft of gunner stations bar the tail gunner) but given the flying conditions and the superb job done by the pathfinders as a result, they couldn't miss.

I would agree with you that there were strong, technical reasons why the Imperial Palace avoided the firestorm but one does get the impression that there were political constraints at work. Tokyo wasn't even in the top 5 on Groves' list for a nuclear strike.

Colin - I agree your summary and also conjecture about political fall out possibilities.

The thing is that LeMay had such latitude as 21th AF CO, reporting directly to Joint Chiefs, that an order to avoid the Emporer's Palace likely would have prohibited fire bombing Tokyo with 300 maxed out B-29s on a target that had mostly wood frame buidlings and a lousy fire department..who would have the conviction that only 13 sq miles would be burned to the ground?

He says nothing about it in his autobiography. Not saying the order was not in place - just wondering what the succeeding logic could be that would assure the survival of the Palace?
 
I think the aiming point for the March attacks were further into the city. The Palace, IIRC, is somewhat south and east of the main city, almost on the fringe.

There is a very good book on this that I read some time back. I may still have it. It covers the attacks in detail. I'll poke around and see if I still have it and see what it says about the Palace Complex. I am almost positive the B29s were told not to attack it. However some of the buildings did burn on the Palace Grounds in later attacks.

Same with Navy Fighters and Bombers when they attacked later in the year.
 
The JCS had strict prohibitions about attacking the Imperial palace for reasons stated below. And I believe the president (FDR) had ordered the prohibition himself.

Theres a small museum right in the middle of the target area, called the "Great Kanto 1923 Earthquake Museum" that has a small exhibit about the fire raids in 1945. This area is near the aiming point for the mission, and was chosen because of its easy to recognize geographical display when seen on a radar scope.

On a side note, near by is the "Edo Tokyo Museum". They have a big map of the Tokyo Bay area, and you can push a button (each button corresponding to a B29 raid) to illuminate what urban areas burned. By light #6, there wasnt much left to bomb in the whole Tokyo/Yokohama metro area.

And yes, people were boiled alive in the Sumida River.

According to the veterans at the B29 website, although the AC commanders were told to go on the mission only with the tail gun position manned, more than a few B29's went off on the mission that night with full crews. It seems the Generals who planned the mission forgot about the gunners also doing duty as engine fire lookouts, and the pilots needed them.

The command staff in the Mariana's never pushed the issue about it though. Turned a blind eye and covered their ears about full crews going out.
 
Last edited:
According to the veterans at the B29 website, although the AC commanders were told to go on the mission only with the tail gun position manned, more than a few B29's went off on the mission that night with full crews
Some interesting points Syscom
but yes, the B-29s only removed the gun stations, not the crews. The crews were needed to look out for other B-29s, the principal hazard in the loose-leaf 'formation' that they were flying. I believe they got rid of even the tail-gun station not many missions after that.
 
No. If anything, that was always manned.

I think the Tail Gunner in the B29 was physically isolated from the crew. Due to the presurization system, he climbed in there early and pretty much stayed there for the whole trip. Not like the B17, he couldn't come back to the main part of the bomber. Not positive, but I'm pretty sure.

As his view was limited forward, it would be important to have other gunners keeping an eye out forward and 90 degrees off.
 
The JCS had strict prohibitions about attacking the Imperial palace for reasons stated below. And I believe the president (FDR) had ordered the prohibition himself.

Theres a small museum right in the middle of the target area, called the "Great Kanto 1923 Earthquake Museum" that has a small exhibit about the fire raids in 1945. This area is near the aiming point for the mission, and was chosen because of its easy to recognize geographical display when seen on a radar scope.

On a side note, near by is the "Edo Tokyo Museum". They have a big map of the Tokyo Bay area, and you can push a button (each button corresponding to a B29 raid) to illuminate what urban areas burned. By light #6, there wasnt much left to bomb in the whole Tokyo/Yokohama metro area.

And yes, people were boiled alive in the Sumida River.

According to the veterans at the B29 website, although the AC commanders were told to go on the mission only with the tail gun position manned, more than a few B29's went off on the mission that night with full crews. It seems the Generals who planned the mission forgot about the gunners also doing duty as engine fire lookouts, and the pilots needed them.

The command staff in the Mariana's never pushed the issue about it though. Turned a blind eye and covered their ears about full crews going out.

Sys has it. The Palace was offlimits for the duration of the war (although the odd buildings were burned during raids).
 
LeMay was not fired for this 'oops' in May 1945 - so the prohibition must not have been very strict..

"In the late Taisho and early Showa eras, more buildings were added that were constructed with concrete, such as the headquarters of the Imperial Household Ministry and the Privy Council. These structures were more modern in appearance with only some token Japanese elements.

From 1888 to 1948, it was called Palace Castle (宮城, Kyūjō?). On the night of 25 May 1945 most of the structures of the Imperial Palace were destroyed in the Allied fire-bombing raid. It was from the basement of the concrete library that Emperor Showa declared the capitulation of Japan in August 1945. Due to the large-scale destruction of the Meiji-era palace, the new main palace hall (Kyūden (宮殿?)) and residences were constructed on the western part of the site in the 1960s. The whole area was renamed literally Imperial Residence (皇居, Kōkyo?) in 1948. The east part was renamed East Garden (東御苑, Higashi-Gyoen?) and has been a public park since 1968."
 
LeMay was not fired for this 'oops' in May 1945 - so the prohibition must not have been very strict..

the prohibition was very strict. The Imperial palace was not on approved target lists and the crews were bluntly told not to aim at it.

In war of this size, rogue bombings was inevitable, especially when done at night in loose formations. Not to mention it was only a mile or so from approved targets. Who would ever know who did it.

And the JCS sure wasnt going to get rid of LeMay when he was delivering the results they wanted.
 
the prohibition was very strict. The Imperial palace was not on approved target lists and the crews were bluntly told not to aim at it.

In war of this size, rogue bombings was inevitable, especially when done at night in loose formations. Not to mention it was only a mile or so from approved targets. Who would ever know who did it.

And the JCS sure wasnt going to get rid of LeMay when he was delivering the results they wanted.

I think that was my point - and incindieries are not precision weapons.. wouldn't matter if a prohibition 'existed' - the answer from the targe planners would be "So, we avoid bombing Tokyo to avoid risk of burning Palace down?"

The answer would be 'no, sorry I brought the 'prohibition' up - just try to not kill the Emperial Palace if possible'
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back