BlackSheep
Banned
- 443
- May 31, 2018
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
The title of the thread is the title of the YouTube video, sorry so screwed.What "above video"?
The title of the thread is the title of the YouTube video, sorry so screwed.
While watching the video, which is color footage of a B-29 raid, I saw something interesting at about the 1'50" mark.
The footage is taken from within a B-29, in very loose formation during a daylight raid, and it is at the moment flak starts, fighters appear, but most interesting to me "phosphorus bombs are dropped from above".
For those links, you win the internet for the day! Thank you, truly fascinating especially the thought of acoustic fuzes being used to listen for the target.The phosphorus bombs were released by fighters, first used in the Pacific.
Here's a good source of info:
YesColour of the "Air War Raid on Tokyo" I want to watch?
It appears to be a couple different missions shown, the one beginning about a minute and a half in with the Sgt doing a radio narration, I'm leaning toward stock footage with a decent editor but I'm not 100% sure. What I do think is that those are Japanese aerial burst bombs probably 250kg, according to the descriptions given in the links provided by Graugeist in post#3.I know that countries experimented with air-to-air bombing. I know that the Japanese also had a flirtation with large-caliber AA filled with submunitions. On the assumption that the footage is stock (rather than mission-specific), I don't know if that's accurate for the mission being described in the narration.
ETA: at 2:41, the narrator relates, "there is a fighter at eleven o'clock -- our tail-gunner is after him." It calls credibility into question, for me, that's a History-Channel-level of basic mistake.
It appears to be a couple different missions shown, the one beginning about a minute and a half in with the Sgt doing a radio narration, I'm leaning toward stock footage with a decent editor but I'm not 100% sure. What I do think is that those are Japanese aerial burst bombs probably 250kg, according to the descriptions given in the links provided by Graugeist in post#3.
The second burst at 2'03" there are two planes in the lower right corner but the slight angle they are flying from the camera bird makes it hard to say with 100% certainty that they are B-29s. They don't have the lengthy look of the 29 and the tail isn't prominent enough to id. There is a slight chance of them being B-24s being that they look short, chunky, and the wing location.Whether they're falling on bombers flying at 24k is what seems open to question to me.
Thank you for doing the hard work, it makes it significantly easier for troglodytes, such as myself, to formulate opinions, theories, and best of all just develop a mental picture of the text in front of us. If I had a war nickel (35% silver!) for every time I've caught myself staring at a model aircraft or a relevant picture while paused in the middle of reading about some dogfight that took place decades before my birth, trying to compose a 3D image of what happened, I could probably buy the software to recreate it on my laptop,A quick dig through my library reveals that between 24/11/44 on Mission 7, the first from the Marianas to Japan, to Mission 20 on 19/1/45, the bombing altitudes of the B-29s varied between 25,000 and 33,000 feet with one night mission at 22,000ft. Formation sizes varied between 29 and 111 aircraft taking off, with drop outs along the way. XXI Bomber Command analysed the 3051 recorded fighter attacks on B-29s in that period. 44% were delivered from the front quarter with 17% from high, 14% level and 13% from low. The remaining 66% of attacks were spread fairly evenly over the other 3 quarters and in terms of height.
After LeMay took over the next 8 Missions to Japan between Jan and early March were, with one exception, flown with an average bombing altitude of 27,000ft. After that it was a lot of night time fire bombing raids starting at 5-8,000 ft. In April there were attacks on the precision targets in Japan from medium altitudes (10-20,000ft).
So we have a range of mission profiles being flown over time, some of which would easily allow aircraft carrying phosphorus bombs to be above the B-29s.
I saw that and was wondering if that was a mechanical failure or some sort of battle damage. I can't picture a scenario where a B-29 would need to deploy landing gear for the extra drag. Anyone?Many of the fighter shots are tail chase from gun cameras. Only those fighters coming at you are from bombers. Did you notice at 1:45 the B-29 flying with nose gear down?
My father in law told of a B-24 mission take off (Pacific) where one of the B-24s blew up completely just after lift off. There was no interruption of the rest of the take off run/mission. They did not go to the debris field until the last aircraft had flown.
The only serious mishap during the take off was at Wendling, where a B-24 of the 392nd Bomb Group ran into a mist patch just off the end of the runway, failed to gain altitude, struck a tree and burst into flames. All ten crewman lost their lives. In B-24 'Jaw-ja Girl', in the line two behind the crashed aircraft, Lieutenant James Muldoon saw the flash and orange glow suddenly appear in front of him. There was a green light from the control tower and with a roar the next B-24 began its take-off run. Then it was Muldoon's turn. "Visibility was poor, we could see only the glow of the fire. Nothing was said over the radio but everyone knew what had happened. The big sweat was that the bombs might detonate as we passed over the crash site. There was no choice but to take off and try to swerve around the burning wreck." Muldoon pushed forward his throttles and accelerated the heavily laden bomber to flying speed, lifted it off the ground and eased it to one side of the orange glow, then leveled out and began his climb.
— Target Berlin by Jeffrey Ethell and Alfred Price, p. 38