Curtiss P-36 with the Wright R-2600 Twin Cyclone (hypothetically)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Among other improvements it used a steel crankcase instead of aluminum, basically it was a new engine that just looked a lot like the old one.
list of other changes doesn't show up in most books/articles.

FWIW, besides some 147 of the B series engines, the Paterson plant was making only the A series (some 23000+ engines made between 1938 and November of 1944 - end of production? November saw just 4 engines made). The B and BB series were made in Cincinnati, at the notorious Lockland plant; some 43000 of R-2600s were produced there, the 1st R-2600 was made in June of 1941.
Patterson was the 'home' of Wright aero engines of interest.

The problem with 2 stage superchargers or high capacity superchargers is that they take power to run. The two stage supercharger in the R-2800 cost about 350hp to run.

Whatever the 2-stage S/Cs took wrt. the indicated HP, they gave a good part of it back via the incresed exhaust thrust at the higher altitudes (exactly where the S/C was requiring the greatest power to do it's job), as well as by enabling the aircraft to fly in the less dense air for the max speed.
Granted, if the exhausts are badly designed, as in the case of the F4F, a lot of that exhaust thrust will be lost beforehand.

Wright was trying to optimize the R-2600, they tried several paths. Some of the paths were used on other Wright engines. Maybe Wright was spread too thin? It does seem that minor tweaking was not going to work.

One of the ways to improve the R-2600, without going with the additional stage of compresson (be that by turbo or by a gear-drien aux S/C) might've been the installation of a bigger engines-stage S/C. With just an 11 in impeller, in the higher altitudes the R-2600 will never be as good as the Hercules or BMW 801 with their 13 in impellers* (and even these needed upgrades to further improve the altitude power), or the Kasei 20 series.
Yes, some power down will be lost, but for a fighter that takes second place behind the altitude power.
Better cooling was feasible via the installation of the cooling fan, or via the 'explosive' cooling like the Lewis gun had, where the exhaust gases are increasing the speed of the cooling air drawing it backwards.

*some post war Hercules versions were also available with 14 in impellers, while some low-altitude ww2 versions were with 12 in impeller
 
Some good comments.
The US didn't figure out exhaust thrust on radials really well until the Hellcat. They had some prototypes (XP-42?) but expecting good exhausts in 1940-41?
One of the ways to improve the R-2600, without going with the additional stage of compresson (be that by turbo or by a gear-drien aux S/C) might've been the installation of a bigger engines-stage S/C.
It might have worked better. The early engines may not have cooled well enough to make it work. How much trouble for only a little more power?
A manual for the A-20G shows 1600hp in low gear at 45in MAP. The 1400hp in high gear is at 46in MAP (about 8lbs boost). The extra 200hp went into the supercharger (and/or thinner hi temp air). engine is still making same1600hp + supercharger low gear +friction loss in the cylinders.
Using a better supercharger helps is several ways but if the cylinders can't dissipate much more heat things are not going to get a lot better.
 

Users who are viewing this thread