Jan 19, 2024 #1 Laurelix Airman 1st Class 280 170 Jun 13, 2016 Been looking everywhere and can't seem to find anything. What also doesn't help is how AM-38F also ends up being called AM-38 in a vague manner
Been looking everywhere and can't seem to find anything. What also doesn't help is how AM-38F also ends up being called AM-38 in a vague manner
Jan 19, 2024 #3 B bf109xxl Senior Airman 586 527 Aug 9, 2023 Laurelix said: Been looking everywhere and can't seem to find anything. What also doesn't help is how AM-38F also ends up being called AM-38 in a vague manner View attachment 758495 Click to expand... From "Aircraft construction in the USSR" by TsAGI, 1994
Laurelix said: Been looking everywhere and can't seem to find anything. What also doesn't help is how AM-38F also ends up being called AM-38 in a vague manner View attachment 758495 Click to expand... From "Aircraft construction in the USSR" by TsAGI, 1994
Jan 19, 2024 Thread starter #4 Laurelix Airman 1st Class 280 170 Jun 13, 2016 bf109xxl said: View attachment 758498 The same source as for the M-82 graph. Click to expand... AM-38 1500hp at SL at military power 1600hp at SL at take off power Better higher alt performance AM-38F 1500hp at SL at military power 1700hp at SL at take off power Worse high alt performance What's been throwing me off is the fact Mig-3 here is listed with AM-38 engine whilst showing 1665hp But it can't be the M-38F because the mig reaches max speed at 3400m Then again… It is specific regards to M-71 and M-71F which would mean it's just the normal AM-38 Last edited: Jan 19, 2024
bf109xxl said: View attachment 758498 The same source as for the M-82 graph. Click to expand... AM-38 1500hp at SL at military power 1600hp at SL at take off power Better higher alt performance AM-38F 1500hp at SL at military power 1700hp at SL at take off power Worse high alt performance What's been throwing me off is the fact Mig-3 here is listed with AM-38 engine whilst showing 1665hp But it can't be the M-38F because the mig reaches max speed at 3400m Then again… It is specific regards to M-71 and M-71F which would mean it's just the normal AM-38
Jan 20, 2024 #5 B bf109xxl Senior Airman 586 527 Aug 9, 2023 From "Mikoyan's Piston-Engined Fighters" (Red Stars Series Vol.10) by Ye.Gordon and K.Dexter, Midland Publishing, 2003, p.56.
From "Mikoyan's Piston-Engined Fighters" (Red Stars Series Vol.10) by Ye.Gordon and K.Dexter, Midland Publishing, 2003, p.56.
Jan 20, 2024 #6 B bf109xxl Senior Airman 586 527 Aug 9, 2023 Laurelix said: Been looking everywhere and can't seem to find anything. What also doesn't help is how AM-38F also ends up being called AM-38 in a vague manner Click to expand... The performance difference between M-38 and M-38F was minimal - only by TO power: From "Russian Piston Aero Engines" by V.Kotelnikov, The Crowood Press, 2005
Laurelix said: Been looking everywhere and can't seem to find anything. What also doesn't help is how AM-38F also ends up being called AM-38 in a vague manner Click to expand... The performance difference between M-38 and M-38F was minimal - only by TO power: From "Russian Piston Aero Engines" by V.Kotelnikov, The Crowood Press, 2005
Jan 20, 2024 #7 Baball Airman 1st Class 160 499 Dec 26, 2018 France You can find the power curves for both versions at p.8 and p.178. in the original manual for the AM-38 and AM-38F.
You can find the power curves for both versions at p.8 and p.178. in the original manual for the AM-38 and AM-38F.
Jan 20, 2024 Thread starter #8 Laurelix Airman 1st Class 280 170 Jun 13, 2016 I think Baball said: You can find the power curves for both versions at p.8 and p.178. in the original manual for the AM-38 and AM-38F. View attachment 758813 View attachment 758814 Click to expand... Thank you
I think Baball said: You can find the power curves for both versions at p.8 and p.178. in the original manual for the AM-38 and AM-38F. View attachment 758813 View attachment 758814 Click to expand... Thank you