Douglas XB-19

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Jeff Hunt

1st Lieutenant
6,815
9,505
Jul 20, 2012
Guelph Ontario Canada
What a beast.

20190617_170913.jpg
 
Yes, its interesting to compare )

I consider it definitely had to be 6-engined )
Why would it have needed 6 engines?
With the 4 engines it was outfitted with, it had a range of over 5,000 miles and could carry a max. load of over 37,000 pounds of bombs - there was no other bomber in WWII that had this ability of either range and/or maximum loadout.

The B-19 was literally a missed opportunity and can be considered the grandfather of all strategic heavy bombers.
 
Why would it have needed 6 engines?
With the 4 engines it was outfitted with, it had a range of over 5,000 miles and could carry a max. load of over 37,000 pounds of bombs - there was no other bomber in WWII that had this ability of either range and/or maximum loadout.

The B-19 was literally a missed opportunity and can be considered the grandfather of all strategic heavy bombers.

With a maximum speed of 224mph and a cruise speed of 135mph?

The XB-19A had a top speed of 265mph and a cruise speed of 185mph, which is more respectable. But only 4,200 miles range.

First flight of the XB-19 was in June 1941. After some testing and improvements, it was accepted by the USAAF in June 1942.

Not sure when it first flew with V-3420s.
 
With a maximum speed of 224mph and a cruise speed of 135mph?

The XB-19A had a top speed of 265mph and a cruise speed of 185mph, which is more respectable. But only 4,200 miles range.

First flight of the XB-19 was in June 1941. After some testing and improvements, it was accepted by the USAAF in June 1942.

Not sure when it first flew with V-3420s.
Considering that the project started in 1935 in answer to the USAAC's "Project D" request - you have to understand what was technologically reasonable at the time.
It wasn't until the B-36, that the B-19 was matched in size, lift ability or range. Even the Luftwaffe's BV238 couldn't match the B-19 in size, range or loadout and it started development 6 years after the B-19.
The only wartime aircraft that surpassed the B-19 in size , would have been the Hughes H-4, but it's projected range and load ability were short of the B-19's actual capability.
 
"Ahem... The Handley Page O/100 would like a word..."

:D
It's true that the O/100 was impressive for it's time, indeed, but compare the B-19's size, lift capabilities and range to that of postwar strategic bombers.

It would have been interesting to see what it's place in history would have been, had there not been delays in getting the prototype debugged and production commenced prior to the U.S. entering the war.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back