wiking85
Staff Sergeant
I've asked some similar questions in the past:
http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/av...r-long-range-naval-recon-do19-ju89-34930.html
http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/av...on-long-range-naval-reconnaissance-34171.html
But not directly this one:
What if the Germans produced the Do26 in numbers and used it for their naval reconnaissance instead of the FW200 and later Ju290 (among others)? Production could begin in 1939, when the model became fully available; historically only 6 were produced, but they could have made many more with the same resources as was used for the Fw200 and Junkers development projects.
I assume they would also make fewer BV138s and other sea planes as a result to balance resource usage.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dornier_Do_26
Like the BV138 it could mount the Hohentwiel radar system when it became available in 1941, which I imagine cut into its range and payload a bit. I also imagine that without a payload the Do26's range was higher because it could carry more fuel.
The advantage is that it doesn't use Avgas, but rather diesel, which IIRC was far easier to make and more plentiful. It also didn't require an airfield, which was at a premium considering how many Luftwaffe planes were crammed into northern France in 1940-41.
What effect does this have on the Uboat war? I'd imagine it would mean more Wolf Packs form and inflict greater losses on convoys especially in the early 1940-41 period when that was still possible. I also think that because it wasn't a good bomber, the British wouldn't be forced to adopt CAM ships, so the Do26 has to contend with fewer threats to its tracking ability. By 1941 there would easily be over 100 in service and would have the Hohentwiel radar, would only be using non-essential fuel and engines with little if any rubber, plus could extend their range by meeting up with sea plane tenders to refuel and relaunch (the Do26 was catapult launch-able) saving fuel on takeoff.
For comparison:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focke-Wulf_Fw_200#Specifications_.28Fw_200C-3.2FU4.29
Notice too the weight difference of the empty aircraft. The Do26 is 6000kg lighter, meaning it requires less material to makes. In fact the Do 26 is only 66% of the weight of the Fw200, so is literally 2/3rds the cost in materials of the Fw200, implying that for the same investment in materials we get 3 Do26s for every 2 Fw200s. Not sure where the extra weight is coming from in the loaded weight of the Do 26 though; fuel maybe?
http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/av...r-long-range-naval-recon-do19-ju89-34930.html
http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/av...on-long-range-naval-reconnaissance-34171.html
But not directly this one:
What if the Germans produced the Do26 in numbers and used it for their naval reconnaissance instead of the FW200 and later Ju290 (among others)? Production could begin in 1939, when the model became fully available; historically only 6 were produced, but they could have made many more with the same resources as was used for the Fw200 and Junkers development projects.
I assume they would also make fewer BV138s and other sea planes as a result to balance resource usage.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dornier_Do_26
Specifications -
Do 26V6
General characteristics
Crew: 4
Payload: 500 kg or 12 fully equipped troops (1,102 lb)
Length: 24.6 m (80 ft 5 in)
Wingspan: 30 m (98 ft 5 in)
Height: 6.85 m (22 ft 8 in)
Wing area: 120 m² (1,291.67 ft²)
Empty weight: 11,300 kg (24,912 lb)
Loaded weight: 22,500 kg (49,601 lb)
Powerplant: 4 × Junkers Jumo 205D Diesel, 656 kW (880 hp) each
Performance
Maximum speed: 324 km/h (175 kn, 201 mph)
Range: 7,100 km (3,834 nmi, 4,412 mi)
Armament
1 × 20 mm MG 151/20 cannon in a bow turret, 3 × aft-firing 7.92 mm (.312 in) MG 15 machine guns
Like the BV138 it could mount the Hohentwiel radar system when it became available in 1941, which I imagine cut into its range and payload a bit. I also imagine that without a payload the Do26's range was higher because it could carry more fuel.
The advantage is that it doesn't use Avgas, but rather diesel, which IIRC was far easier to make and more plentiful. It also didn't require an airfield, which was at a premium considering how many Luftwaffe planes were crammed into northern France in 1940-41.
What effect does this have on the Uboat war? I'd imagine it would mean more Wolf Packs form and inflict greater losses on convoys especially in the early 1940-41 period when that was still possible. I also think that because it wasn't a good bomber, the British wouldn't be forced to adopt CAM ships, so the Do26 has to contend with fewer threats to its tracking ability. By 1941 there would easily be over 100 in service and would have the Hohentwiel radar, would only be using non-essential fuel and engines with little if any rubber, plus could extend their range by meeting up with sea plane tenders to refuel and relaunch (the Do26 was catapult launch-able) saving fuel on takeoff.
For comparison:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focke-Wulf_Fw_200#Specifications_.28Fw_200C-3.2FU4.29
Specifications
Fw 200C-3/U4 (late war model-post 1942)
General characteristics
Crew: 5
Capacity: 30 fully armed troops in transport configuration
Length: 23.45 m (76 ft 11 in)
Wingspan: 32.85 m (107 ft 9 in)
Height: 6.30 m (20 ft 8 in)
Wing area: 119.85 m² (1,290 ft²)
Empty weight: 17,005 kg (37,490 lb)
Max. takeoff weight: 24,520 kg (50,057 lb)
Powerplant: 4 × BMW/Bramo 323R-2 nine-cylinder single-row air-cooled radial engine, 895 kW (1,200hp) each
Performance
Maximum speed: 360 km/h (195 knots, 224 mph) at 4,800 m (15,750 ft)[14]
Cruise speed: 335 km/h (181 knots, 208 mph) at 4,000 m (13,100 ft) (Max cruise)
Range: 3,560 km (1,923 nmi, 2,212 mi)
Endurance: 14 hrs
Service ceiling: 6,000 m (19,700 ft)
Armament
Guns:
1 × 20 mm MG 151/20 cannon in forward gondola
4 × 13 mm MG 131 machine gun (dorsal and beam positions)
Bombs: Up to 2,100 kg (4,360 lb) of bombs
Notice too the weight difference of the empty aircraft. The Do26 is 6000kg lighter, meaning it requires less material to makes. In fact the Do 26 is only 66% of the weight of the Fw200, so is literally 2/3rds the cost in materials of the Fw200, implying that for the same investment in materials we get 3 Do26s for every 2 Fw200s. Not sure where the extra weight is coming from in the loaded weight of the Do 26 though; fuel maybe?
Last edited: