Nodeo-Franvier
Airman 1st Class
- 124
- Jul 13, 2020
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
The F-5 would have been in concept very similar to the MiG-21 so the idea is not new.
Performance wise the info would have been in the public domain so the Soviets should have had a rough guide to it's top speed.
So to me it would be about metals electrics engines and so on not necessarily copying but taking good ideas which may work better.
There is a huge problem. The F-5 would have been a pretty aged 2nd rate fighter by this time so if you are copying then you are copying obsolescent tech. That is not going to help you in the long term.
So maybe the F-5 was a reference guide or maybe a cheap way for R and D. But performance wise not really relevant.
The Soviets did make a bolt by bolt copy of the F-5 and called it the MiG-28.
The F-5E was introduced in the 70's as a second version of the original F-5, so it had revisions that made it very current on the world stage.There is a huge problem. The F-5 would have been a pretty aged 2nd rate fighter by this time so if you are copying then you are copying obsolescent tech. That is not going to help you in the long term.
Okay chum. April 1 is a few months away. Try again then.I am surprised you never heard of the MiG-28. Next you be telling me never heard of the Firefox. It had thought controlled weapon system.
what you mean? - somehow all analog cokpits are similar especially for persons who has limited knowledge of the topic, you will find there the same gauges and controls, but in details they are all very differentDoes anyone know how the cockpit of Mig-23,Mig-29 and F-5 Compared?
Great picture. Taxiing behind a T-38 I was always amaze of how those gear struts could get up into that wing (the wheels themself went into the fuselage). That's a lot cooler paint scheme than the last T-38 scheme.Here's a great view of a "MiG-28" or better known in the real world as an OPFOR F-5E...
View attachment 606009