Fighter with the best roll rate...?

Discussion in 'Flight Test Data' started by B-17engineer, Feb 11, 2010.

  1. B-17engineer

    B-17engineer Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2007
    Messages:
    14,953
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    model builder
    Location:
    Revis Island.
    If this has been asked before, my apologies.

    Which aircraft had the fastest roll rate during WWII?

    Thanks!
     
  2. krieghund

    krieghund Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    611
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Occupation:
    Avionics Engineer Advisor to RSAF
    Location:
    Riyadh
    These should provide your answer
     

    Attached Files:

  3. timshatz

    timshatz Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2006
    Messages:
    4,441
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    MGR
    Location:
    Phila, Pa
    Figured it would be the 190.

    Does going with the prop increase the roll rate?
     
  4. davebender

    davebender Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2009
    Messages:
    6,418
    Likes Received:
    64
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Michigan, USA
    The Meteor III and Spitfire 21 were not operational during WWII to any significant extent. But if they are included then the Me-262, Ta-152, Do-335, He-162 and P-51H should also be on the chart.
     
  5. billswagger

    billswagger Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2009
    Messages:
    256
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    i figured the Fw 190 would be at the top of the list, but i wanted to see how the other axis planes stacked up.

    any 109 roll info, or Macchi /G series info ?

    what about the Russian birds?


    I recently posted in another thread how the Spit mk1 and 109E were horrible in high speed roll performance.
    I know later variants saw improvements.




    Bill
     
  6. FLYBOYJ

    FLYBOYJ "THE GREAT GAZOO"
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2005
    Messages:
    23,200
    Likes Received:
    785
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Aircraft Maintenance Manager/ Flight Instructor
    Location:
    Colorado, USA
    The P-40 should be in there as well
     
  7. timshatz

    timshatz Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2006
    Messages:
    4,441
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    MGR
    Location:
    Phila, Pa
    Good point.

    How about the F4F and F2B? Both were probably fast rollers.
     
  8. renrich

    renrich Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2007
    Messages:
    4,542
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    real estate
    Location:
    Montrose, Colorado
    This is hard to answer becuse of many factors, including speed and which model of which fighter but F4U should be considered as well as P40.
     
  9. drgondog

    drgondog Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2006
    Messages:
    7,359
    Likes Received:
    561
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Executive, Consulting
    Location:
    Scurry, Texas
    Yes. having said that the relative roll 'opposite' should be similar but slower.

    It is in this discussion that a P-38 jumps a bit with counter rotating props - it will improve relative roll against the others.
     
  10. Hop

    Hop Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    624
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    18
  11. B-17engineer

    B-17engineer Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2007
    Messages:
    14,953
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    model builder
    Location:
    Revis Island.
    Didn't the Zero have some weakness in a dive rolling to the the right?
     
Loading...

Share This Page