Any information on this? I have not seen Fw 190 spinning and spin recovery characteristics discussed in any book. Neither does any Fw 190 docs reproduced on www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org discuss it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
I have read that due to the construction of the Fw 190 wing, "power on" stall characteristics could lead to a vicious stall, spin and tumble. But this involves discussion of things like "spanwise lift distribution" that are way above my pay grade. From memory the wing had around 2% washout but there was a section that had no washout at all.Any information on this? I have not seen Fw 190 spinning and spin recovery characteristics discussed in any book. Neither does any Fw 190 docs reproduced on www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org discuss it.
From what I understand it was always in the same direction and some "expert" pilots used the maneuver as an escape maneuver.I have read that due to the construction of the Fw 190 wing, "power on" stall characteristics could lead to a vicious stall, spin and tumble. But this involves discussion of things like "spanwise lift distribution" that are way above my pay grade. From memory the wing had around 2% washout but there was a section that had no washout at all.
Outer 20% had zero washout.I have read that due to the construction of the Fw 190 wing, "power on" stall characteristics could lead to a vicious stall, spin and tumble. But this involves discussion of things like "spanwise lift distribution" that are way above my pay grade. From memory the wing had around 2% washout but there was a section that had no washout at all.
That's easy for you to say, don't ask me what it means in terms of span wise lift distribution though. 95% of my knowledge on this is contained in the attached document, which I can follow but couldnt argue for or against without it in front of me. For example much of the "twist" in the wing must be in the prop wash region. http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org/mustang/Lednicer_Fighter_Aerodynamics.pdfOuter 20% had zero washout.
I sent that doc many years ago. FWIIWThat's easy for you to say, don't ask me what it means in terms of span wise lift distribution though. 95% of my knowledge on this is contained in the attached document, which I can follow but couldnt argue for or against without it in front of me. For example much of the "twist" in the wing must be in the prop wash region. http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org/mustang/Lednicer_Fighter_Aerodynamics.pdf