Fw better then Me-262?

Discussion in 'Aviation' started by Wespe, Feb 23, 2007.

  1. Wespe

    Wespe Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2007
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Occupation:
    Very near to my house
    Location:
    In a House
    I dont think the Fw was better as a whole then the Me-262, or a more versatile plane:
    Especially not from August 1944 onward.

    As a fighter: NO
    As a Recon: NO
    As a Nightfighter: NO
    As a Ground: attackplane: Maybe
    As a trainer: both did their job
    What else? Sofar it is 4:2 for the Me-262

    Wespe
     

    Attached Files:

  2. FLYBOYJ

    FLYBOYJ "THE GREAT GAZOO"
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2005
    Messages:
    23,209
    Likes Received:
    791
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Aircraft Maintenance Manager/ Flight Instructor
    Location:
    Colorado, USA
    you left out reliability....
     
  3. Gnomey

    Gnomey World Travelling Doctor
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2004
    Messages:
    41,800
    Likes Received:
    519
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Doctor
    Location:
    Portsmouth / Royal Deeside, UK
    Home Page:
    As a fighter the Fw was as good as any fighter which makes it a successful fighter especially if you take the D and the Ta into the equation.
    As a recon it didn't really perform this role as there were better aircraft available.
    Again it didn't really perform the night fighter role as twin engined aircraft were more effective and better able to carry radar.
    As a ground attack, yes the fw was more effective. It could carry more ordinance and therefore could do more damage.
    As a trainer both did what they needed to do - train pilots - but at the same time they didn't do much of it as there was no/little fuel.

    The only thing the Me-262 has over any plane in WW2 is speed (and armament). Speed is not going to enable you to beat your opponent, just pick and choose your fight. Besides the Me-262 took a long time to spool up and spool down when it was easy prey for any allied fighter. The engines were prone to flame-outs and easily damaged (unlike the Fw which had an engine that didn't flame-out as was able to take a lot of damage).

    There you see that the FW was better in almost every respect apart from speed and speed isn't everything.
     
  4. DerAdlerIstGelandet

    DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crew Chief
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    41,775
    Likes Received:
    687
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    A&P - Aircraft Technician
    Location:
    USA/Germany
    Alright Wespe. Here you go. First of all I am not saying the Fw-190 was better than the Me-262 in any given role. So dont use my words wrong in this thread either.

    What I am saying is the the Fw-190 was a more versatile aircraft and it could perform more roles successfully than the Me-262.

    Here is a list of roles the Fw-190 could perform and had versions therefore of.

    Fighter
    Night Fighter
    Recon
    Fighter-Bomber
    Torpedo-Bomber
    Ground Attack and Close Air Support
    Trainer
    Mistel-Carrier
    Interceptor
    Tank Buster

    It performed all these roles very well and as a plus it did not have to worry about its engines flaming out because its engine actually had some life to it.
     
  5. DerAdlerIstGelandet

    DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crew Chief
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    41,775
    Likes Received:
    687
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    A&P - Aircraft Technician
    Location:
    USA/Germany
    Exactly most people seem to understand that. Besides the Me-262 would not dogfight at its top speed anyhow. No planes got into fights at top speed.
     
  6. DerAdlerIstGelandet

    DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crew Chief
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    41,775
    Likes Received:
    687
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    A&P - Aircraft Technician
    Location:
    USA/Germany
    And if you really want to branch it out. The Fw-190 had fighter versions that were Long Range Fighters, All-Weather Fighters and specifically designed for attacking Bombers.

    It also had Night Ground Attack versions as well as versions that were specifically designed as Attack Aircraft.

    It has the Me-262 beat handsdown in versatility.
     
  7. lesofprimus

    lesofprimus Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Messages:
    19,162
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Communications
    Location:
    Long Island Native in Mississippi
    Home Page:
    Agreed, the 262 was waaaay too limitied in its roles, and the 190 wasnt... Hands down to the Wurger...
     
  8. DerAdlerIstGelandet

    DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crew Chief
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    41,775
    Likes Received:
    687
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    A&P - Aircraft Technician
    Location:
    USA/Germany
    I guess he is going to come back and say the Me-262 was a Transformer!
     
  9. lesofprimus

    lesofprimus Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Messages:
    19,162
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Communications
    Location:
    Long Island Native in Mississippi
    Home Page:
    Anyone with any knowledge knows the 190 was far better than the 262, maybe he'll learn something...
     
  10. DerAdlerIstGelandet

    DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crew Chief
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    41,775
    Likes Received:
    687
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    A&P - Aircraft Technician
    Location:
    USA/Germany
    Doubt it. He has been studying this for 35 years. He is the utmost athority on aviation in the world!
     
  11. Wespe

    Wespe Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2007
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Occupation:
    Very near to my house
    Location:
    In a House
    And you point being. The Fw-190 was as good as the allied fighters out there and it was in bigger numbers. It did not go up against Me-262s and therefore it was more successful.

    Still does not matter. The Fw-190 could do the recon role really well. Again no one is saying that the Fw-190 was faster than the Me-262. No one is saying that it was better overall. Besides the Fw-190 could run away without fear of his engines flaming out.

    The Fw served as a Night figher in larger numbers and was just as good as the allied aircraft out there. Fw takes this one again...

    Yes it does look bad, because the Me-262 was not the most versatile fighter. Could it perform the most roles Wespe? If you say yes you are a fool...

    And when did the Jumos of the 262 become reliable? Oh wait a minute they never did!

    So it would still be:

    No you can not give Torpedo to the Me-262 since there were no versions that could carry a Torpedo. It would have been a shitty one anyhow since it could not carry the payload of a Torpedo...

    Again you brought this up. You say the Me-262 is more versatile. I prove you it was not in that it could not perform as many roles. You still dont see the light...

    I agree it is a stupid role, but the Fw-190 could do it and the Me-262 was never tested or used in that capacity. Therefore you can list it as a role for the 262 and another one for the Fw-190.

    The Fw still had a longer range than the Me-262 in the long range role. Therefore the Me-262 loses again.

    Where do you come up with that? The Fw-190 is more versatile than the Me-262? You keep going around the subject and coming up with this 4-1 and then 6-4 crap.

    Negative. The Me-262 could not do half the roles the Fw-190 could do. Are you blind?

    Go back to my list. Those were actual roles performed by the Fw-190. The Me-262 could not do half of those.

    Your 35 years of reading books has not done anything for you, yet my 26 years of reading books, flying planes and fixing planes has done more for me obviously.

    And the other 10 roles that the Fw-190 could perform and the Me-262 could not...
     

    Attached Files:

  12. Wespe

    Wespe Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2007
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Occupation:
    Very near to my house
    Location:
    In a House
    By the way,from 44 onwards the primary function of the fighter squadrons was to shot down bombers and not fighters.

    So firepower and "speed" was "everything"

    Wespe
     

    Attached Files:

  13. DerAdlerIstGelandet

    DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crew Chief
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    41,775
    Likes Received:
    687
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    A&P - Aircraft Technician
    Location:
    USA/Germany
    Ooops sorry about that. I accidently clicked on Edit instead of reply. Therefore it posted mine on Wespes post. :lol:

    Sorry about that. So anyone can go back and look at my post on his post in his post until I correct that when I get back. Going out with the wife tonight.

    Wespe I will correct that later when I get back.
     
  14. Gnomey

    Gnomey World Travelling Doctor
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2004
    Messages:
    41,800
    Likes Received:
    519
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Doctor
    Location:
    Portsmouth / Royal Deeside, UK
    Home Page:
    The Me-262 would not of been a feasible torpedo bomber because of its speed, the torpedo would like disintegrate when it the water and if the Me-262 slowed down it would be extremely vulnerable to attack before it got up to speed again.

    Jet engines are more thirsty than the radial in the Fw (especially with two of them) despite any extra fuel the Me-262 could carry the Fw should always have the legs on it.

    Again faster is NOT best, just because it can out run anything it comes up against doesn't make it a good aircraft. The faster you the harder it is to hit anything, therefore I bet if you look at the hit ratios/tank kills for the Fw190 (A/F) compared to the Me-262 there will be a large difference between the hits achieved by each with the Fw190 having the higher ratio (thus making it more effective at this role and so a better aircraft).

    Once the Me-262 had lost its speed (as would happen in a dogfight) it was less maneuverable than the Fw190. Put the two in a dogfight and I would put money on the Fw190 winning (especially a D or a Ta).

    Speed is not the key to a successful aircraft! Speed doesn't make it the best aircraft! Speed isn't everything!

    The Me-262 is no the "uber" plane you are trying to make it out to be (none of the first generation jets were that much better than their piston engined counterparts except in the speed category. Look at Erich's thread on jet kills and you will see how many were shot down by Allied fighters which you say should not be able to touch the Me-262. Seafury's and Corsair's shot down Mig's in Korea and the Mig was a lot better than the Me-262 so there wouldn't of been a problem (and there wasn't really for the Tempests, P-51's, Spitfires etc of the Allied airforces).

    Your argument is rather baseless...
     
  15. delcyros

    delcyros Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2005
    Messages:
    2,037
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Berlin (Kreuzberg)
    Some of You might find it interesting that the FW-190A in it´s early development stage (1941 and 1942 in France) had engine reliability problems.

    The overhaul times for the BMW 801 by then was 20-25 hours! Compare that with the 15-25 hours for the early Jumo-004B1, not that much of a difference:shock:

    However, this is a sidenote. In general, I strongly support the view expressed by Gnoomy, Adler Wespe.

    regards,
    delc
     
  16. Wespe

    Wespe Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2007
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Occupation:
    Very near to my house
    Location:
    In a House
    Hi Gnomey

    I am not making an (ueber-plane) out of the Me-262. I am simply stating that the 262 was the better plane.

    If you do not give a priority towards speed, you are right in a way to point out that speed isn't everything, but you seem to ignore that due to the overwhelming odds, it was the only thing that could give a Luftwaffe pilot a chance to survive, before and after maybe shooting down a bomber or fighter. I never said that a 262 is invincible. I can understand that from American or allied point of view, this all doesn't matter - free for the motto: who cares how fast they are we won the war anyway, or in 1944 - we will win anyway no matter how fast they are. So speed isnt everything from the allied point of view, but this does not apply to the Luftwaffe point of view. And if Galland would not have pushed this topic, the 262 would have been some funny sideshow flying meaningless ground attack sorties.

    Torpedo and Mistel capabillities can be forwarded but to my believe are totally irrellevant.

    Range,okay yes, but who needed a range in 44 or 45 that could not be provided by the 262, 1000km range.

    Also to point out constantly, that the 262 was not in availability such as the Fw doesnt have any indication on a competition of a plane. When the RLM had its competitions or evaluations it was e.g. one Bf against one Fw and not the existing 2000? Bf in 1941 against the one Fw prototyp.

    The only thing a Fw could do better, and I never dissagread was the ground attack role.
    Anything else a 262 could do just as well but with one major advantage "speed". That the plane was in its early stages is known, and I would not use that in order to explain failures but also not to indicate that a modell that derived from 40/42 was better due to its development time.

    And a F-86 was definatly not worse then a P-51 just because it could be shoot down by a prop or had engine problems in its early days.
    The F-86 could just as well perform as a P-51 but "faster" and therefore bring the factor of "survival" to the US and UN pilots making it the better plane, no matter how many roles the P-51 could do and the Sabre could not.

    Wespe
     

    Attached Files:

  17. Gnomey

    Gnomey World Travelling Doctor
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2004
    Messages:
    41,800
    Likes Received:
    519
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Doctor
    Location:
    Portsmouth / Royal Deeside, UK
    Home Page:
    :rolleyes:

    Even with the speed a lot of Me-262's got shot down. Yes at top speed it was faster but it could be caught by an Allied plane in a dive and then shot down. Without the advantage of altitude the speed of the Me-262 was rather wasted as the Allied prop planes could dive to catch up with it.
     
  18. Erich

    Erich the old Sage
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    13,090
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Platonic Sphere
    well I have to put my puny white butt in here..........

    will not say much yet as I am in the middle of a couple big jobs in the snow , but be prepared Wespe (in fact go by you're real name please if you want a real answer) to get your fantaises smeared all over the skies.

    what was the Me 262 A created for ? by answering this correctly you will gain a head full of knowledge which will help you realize where the Me 262 should be placed with the ranks of the Fw multi-variants.

    It's simple the Fw 190 outperformed the 262 in everything but flat-out speed. Had the Me 262B-2a been available then it would of been the ultimate German night fighter but it did not ........ there is more .........

    well I will tantalize your brain matter later tonight

    bis bald E ♫
     
  19. Wespe

    Wespe Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2007
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Occupation:
    Very near to my house
    Location:
    In a House
    And a Fw going in for the landing or a dive could be wasted just as well by an allied plane. Come on this doesn't proof anything.

    However the Luftwaffe claimes for the 262 a total kill of about 700 planes.

    That would be a kill ratio of 2 or 3:1 for the 262. No 109 or Fw can claim that kill ratio, or did the Luftwaffe shoot down 100,000 allied planes?:rolleyes: .

    So this figure already proofs significantly more or less everything about the capabilities of a 262 compared to a Fw or Bf or what ever axis or allied a/c.

    Wespe
     

    Attached Files:

  20. FLYBOYJ

    FLYBOYJ "THE GREAT GAZOO"
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2005
    Messages:
    23,209
    Likes Received:
    791
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Aircraft Maintenance Manager/ Flight Instructor
    Location:
    Colorado, USA

    You're comparing a 2nd generation jet fighter aircraft to a ww2 aircraft - apples to oranges. Look that the thrust, power to weight ratio and internal systems of the F-86 and they are light years a head of the P-51.

    But going back to the -262, First generation jet with barely 1500 pounds of thrust per engine that will last 10 - 20 hours if you're lucky (BTW to enlighten you about jet engine operation, you can't fly 100% continually). I suggest you look into how long the -262 could sustain its top speed due to normal operating limitation, you'll be very surprised.
     
Loading...

Share This Page