- Thread starter
- #21
Donivanp
Lieutenant Colonel
Sorry to say I've nothing that will fit for this GB. My stash is very small these days.![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Sorry to say I've nothing that will fit for this GB. My stash is very small these days.![]()
Come on and "just do it" mate to Bf 109's together!Got a few choices, hopefully will find time to enter
Well my choices are.Come on and "just do it" mate to Bf 109's together!
Who's Do 17? ICM?Well my choices are.
ICM Ju 88
Do 17
Academy P-38 J
AMT A-20 B
Monogram He 111 with V.1
Revell B-25 B
I did their Di 17 back a couple years back. Landing gear was my problem. Loved the kit. Be careful with that landing gear and the exhaust is a bit of a finicky issue.Yep.
Forgot to say all 1/48 as usual
Built that one.That He 111 was an enjoyable kit as well.
Indeed, nice kitBuilt that one.
View attachment 841471
This is way too relatableSorry to say I've nothing that will fit for this GB. My stash is very small these days.![]()
Make er happen ol boyConsidering trying to enter this build... brave or stupid again, we'll see.
Italeri 1:72 Ju 88 Mistel 1 Grossbombe (sans fighter führerflugzeug for now), OOB save for some minor enhancements.
View attachment 845614
Kit is started as shown - wings already glued, but not cleaned up. Would anyone object?
The input I would install here would be to confuse the matter. WWII has several "end" dates, the Japanese surrender date, the signing of the surrender aboard the USS Missouri, and the US Army considered occupation forces still in WWII until 1946!I am not going to claim authority in ruling without being specifically given it. My opinion is that it has to be in markings it had while in service during WW2. If you can at least determine what official squadron markings it would have had it can be done with those. I submitted a hypothetical build in GB52 using squadron markings with my own nose art. I would not like a model of the 1990 version especially if it is not a recreation of a real squadron. I welcome further comment.