102first_hussars
Tech Sergeant
Okay I saw this program on Discovery about the Top Ten Best fighter aircraft, I didnt fully agree with their results so I would like to see what you guys think.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Dogwalker said:There isn't the Mig 25. My vote is for it.
DogW
Gnomey said:Well it originated in Russia so a 3:10 ratio is acceptable you just send up 4 times as many planes
Gnomey said:And my vote goes to the F-86, it showed good service in Korea and onwards.
Nonskimmer said:I think I remember that thread, Joe.
Another thing where is the Lightning (EE not Lockheed)...
plan_D said:He suffocated while his head was stuck up a kangeroos' ass.
How pleasant...FLYBOYJ said:plan_D said:He suffocated while his head was stuck up a kangeroos' ass.
102first_hussars said:Another thing where is the Lightning (EE not Lockheed)...
Its an excellent plane, but it didnt have a major influence in the history of Dog Fighting.
No sweat!Dogwalker said:
102first_hussars said:I guess the russians thought it was top of the line, ahead of its time, so much a pilot had to go rogue and take one to Japan, but like you said FBJ it was nothing but steel, Cathoder ehem I mean Cathode tubes, goes to show what Russias idea of high quality was then eh?
evangilder said:One of the reason for using vacuum tubes in the Mig-25 is that they are not succeptible to EMP (Electro-Magnetic Pulse). Any fighter that is going after a nuclear bomber should have the least amount of succeptibility to EMP.
And for the record guys, Cathode Ray Tubes, or CRTs are still used even today. That is the screen for computers, TVs, radars and even American Fighters carried them for many years.