Halifax III Drawing
- Thread starter Micdrow
- Start date
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
- Thread starter
- #3
Paul.
Thanks!!!!
Thorlifter
Captain
I'm curious about the 4x.303 turrets. Any records to indicate they were any more/less effective than a 2x.50?
Nice one Micdrow takes me back to the "Lion" comics of my youth, every week an new cutout drawing.
Thorlifter Similar debate on in
http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/technical/british-bomber-armament-question-17473.html#post471061
It was standard defensive armament in British bombers Wellingtons, Stirling, Halifax and Lancasters.
Later in the war twin .5 did replace the 4 x .303 in the rear turrets and they also appeared in the mid upper turrets as did 20mm canons.
Thorlifter Similar debate on in
http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/technical/british-bomber-armament-question-17473.html#post471061
It was standard defensive armament in British bombers Wellingtons, Stirling, Halifax and Lancasters.
Later in the war twin .5 did replace the 4 x .303 in the rear turrets and they also appeared in the mid upper turrets as did 20mm canons.
