I have a little peripheral background in the subject which I won't explain until I know you better
and believe personally that the victims in any direct capacity (Holocaust survivors or relatives of survivors) should be supported individually 100% in any course they feel strongly urged to take, which is legal, given reasonable consideration.
However where one not directly associated takes up the charge it immediatelly begins to look overly political, like someone is using the genuine pain of others in a childish attempt to run for office.
Some representative a Nazi Hunter Coop can go to hell to put it bluntly, he's no different to the Nazis by determination (they felt utterly justified too), but if this representative is directly associated with the Holocaust (and I do not mean by assuming ideological comaraderie with the victims but directly victimised), then in complete turn around they have my 100% active support in all their efforts.
It is terribly belittling for victims of abuse to have ignorantly goodwilled people come along and take even more of what is theirs. It may be well intentioned, but again do so few people realise that all evil movements are well intentioned...from their own point of view. This is its very horrifying nature.
What this lady is trying to say is, careful what you become when you chase the destination without thinking about the road taken to get there. I don't think she wants to see Neo-Nazis by any other name calling themselves Nazi Hunters.
edit to add, I do fully support traditional war crimes tribunals between military organisations examining the conduct most particularly of ranking personnel among belligerent nations, just that in some cases I feel Nazi Hunting does not fit into this category.