How little they know...

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Laughing so hard, I almost cried.... :lol:

Oh go on, you know that you want to! Just for the perverted fun of it!

I'll have a bash at provoking them into a debate with equally stupid comments later this evening.
Should pass the time until the Missus goes to bed and I can get on the xbox.

Cheers Chris
 
I don't want any of what they're smoking.

I don't think they'd be smoking anything allegedly inferred to. ...too busy watching 'My Country Is Largely Talentless or My Parents Lied To Me, Y (..Did They)-Factor' on their personal viewing device, that and the lack of induced semi-focussed theorising going way off at a humouristic tangent..

Mmm, well it could be more worse, they could be in power/office now! and/or as aerially historically ignorant akin to some who troll at an aviation game/simulator-s home website usually can be at times.
 
Last edited:
The quotes I posted were the gems of the bunch, but I still get a pretty good laugh at some of the "informative" lines in there:

The British designed the motor for that role, and it was not dependable. Rolls-Royce actually developed the motor. I forget who bought it here in America, IH, maybe. I forget. They are the ones who took the motor and developed the plane around the motor.
- Their reference to "IH" is most likely International Harvester, a tractor, truck and utility engine manufacturer that also built a line of vehicles for several years...

P-51D, an american failure fixed by the RAF - :lol:

And to be even more historically correct ground strafing was the main role of the p38 lightning and it's English variant the mosquito.
- Love the "English variant" reference. I was surprised to know that DeHavilland manufactured the English version of the P-38 and called it a Mosquito...who knew?

The P47 was adapted later in WW2 for tank busting, using a 37 mm fuselage mounted canon. Very inaccurate and the recoil was a big problem.
- I'm sure that having a 37mm cannon mounted anywhere in the P-47's fuselage would have caused problems!

Ya. They found out in Nam 51's were to vulnerable to ground fire for ground support role. Still, fastest prop fighter ever!
- I'm sure that a P-51 used in 'Nam would have had more things to worry about besides ground fire...

P-51s were hardly ever used as ground attack aircraft, perhaps never.
- Perhaps never!! I'm going to say that there were quite a few Germans that would have disagreed with this.

well i have to tell you, youre totally wrong... the 51's p and f's were outfitted with bombs, and had alot of secondary uses other than escorts and fighters. they had a bigger fuel load than most fighters then, and could carry out longer and more covert missions - nope. f and p 51's were outfitted with bombs, and could easily have ran those missions.
- That P-51F and P-51P sounds seriously badass...I'd love to see one, but they were covert, therefore secret :(

The German Focke-Wulf Fw-190D series came close to matching it but it came too late in the war, very few were built
- This is a real shame, too, since the Fw190 was a nice aircraft...perhaps the Germans should have made more of them earlier...

I almost feel compelled to go look for more of this stuff! :evil4:
 
My Brain Hurts.JPG
 
Your brains hurts, many others will too lol, mind-due, theirs didn't even register it'd seem to those with more historical programming, then again some nice mix of partial infos jumbled together with incorrect A/C, eras and 'it was sometime time way before I was born or care-ology'..

37mm cannon (Stuka G?) fuz mounted (Martinn B26, Ki46II Otsu-Dragon Killer/Shlacht Muzik) P47 Thunderbolt - hell atleast they didn't say the Thunderbolt had 4 GAU8 Avenger gatling cannons in each wing....
 
Last edited:
If I could be bothered, I'd post there along the lines of "Don't spout b*ll*cks when you know **** all. Go and do some studying of facts before committing cr@p to the 'net." Followed by "You have two eyes, two ears and one mouth. Use the pairs long before the single".
 
I'm afraid I used to get this sort of cr@p at least once a month, when I used to present lectures, six times a day, to six different groups, on the development, use and effects of infantry weapons.
There was always at least one ****ing 'Anorak' who knew better, as he'd had 'lots of experience' - on video games!!!!
Never actually used the real weapon(s), and most often, hadn't even seen one until coming to my presentation, but tried to tell me, a qualified SA instructor, what was what!
That's when I used to use that phrase, rather than say "Shut the **** up, d***head !".
 
Why not post pics of the German marked Mustang, Thunderbolt, Spitfire and the Lightning, h*ll...throw in that Italian Lightning as well, that would confuse the sh*t out of them! :lol:
 
If they have had a such general knowledge , the P-51 Mustang or P-47 with the German markings doesn't matter.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back