Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
I see where the USAF is going to adopt a new approach for pilot applicants.
In the past a pilot applicant that had attained a private pilot's license was given extra credit. But that approach is now thought to be unfair, since only people who are pretty well off could afford to do that. This put many poorer and often minority applicants at a disadvantage so that preference for someone who already knows how to fly is being done away with. 86% of USAF pilote are White and that has been determined to be excessive.
The Air Force tried putting pilot trainees directly into T-37's for a while but later decided that was an expensive way to find out that an applicant was going to take too much effort to train. So they introduced training in T-41's (and other light aircraft for ROTC) to weed out those who were not suitable, or at least would take too long to train.
So, given the type of military aircraft we have today, does getting a private pilot's license first really indicate what can be expected of an applicant?
Wouldn't testing wannabees in a simulator be a cheaper and safer way off weeding out?
No worries - Yep - those advanced sims are used at the IFT and USAF Academy. They help immensely but candidates still fly in an airplane.
The goal is based on the individual who gets accepted to the academy. My old boss's daughter gat accepted to the academy and initially had no interest in flying until she went through the soaring program. Last I heard She's flying E-3s.In 1960 at USAFA it was understood that not all wanted to be pilots. What is the goal today? If a person today does not attend a University but flys syms enough to pass into flight training, how is that regarded as a pilot candidate without a college degree?
My point exactly. The minority program must first include a four year degree. The candidate can not simply get a PPL and then go to fighter school.
One reason I asked (other that the YSM aspect) is that I know a retired USAF F-15 pilot who flies some truly thrilling airshow routines and also pilots a P-51 and a WWII biplane taking paying customers on rides. And he is of the opinion that most USAF pilots are "appliance operators" who use about as much skill as a teenager putting a Hot Pocket in the microwave. So maybe you just have to sit there, read the gauges, and push the right buttons IAW the manual. The Smithsonian series Air Disasters displays many cases of airline pilots sitting there and doing just that, with disastrous consequences, not noticing that they have dialed in a course that is over 90 deg off the required flight path or that the pressurization system has not even been turned on.
And flight simulators are useful in learning system operation and procedures, but, as you indicate, getting sick or scared or confused in one is rare. I recall one day I was in the pattern at our airport. It was a bit busy in terms of traffic and I looked back when I was on final and saw a Cessna 152 turning base with the pilot announcing that fact over the radio. I thought to myself, "How could any simulator even approach this?"
As to why 86% is not "low enough" in someone's estimation, you got me there.
In certain situations I have to agree but I think all that changes in a combat situation where this "appliance operator" has to make very complicated decisions on what buttons to push. Errors will result in his or other's death.
It can develop into a strange discussion. In the UK statistically the Welsh are the best singers and Rugby players per head of population. If you want a singer or Rugby player do you go to Wales or teach all the people in UK to not only sing and play Rugby like the Welsh but love and respect singing and playing Rugby in the same way. In WW2 before gyro gunsights were introduced the best marksmen generally were good shots with a gun or shotgun, do you give a credit to someone who is a crack shot when he arrives for training or teach the whole country to shoot? How many people do you want on a scheme to produce how many pilots? I have no idea how we select and train captains for UK aircraft carriers, we only have two.My point exactly. The minority program must first include a four year degree. The candidate can not simply get a PPL and then go to fighter school.
There's also a question of liability if credit was given by a school for something that was allegedly previously covered and later on there is an incident that involved that segment of training.There are plenty of reasons for not allowing the PPL to act as an advantage, and I'm not going to speak to the minority issue. But...
One ex-customer (a flying school) wouldn't offer a significant reduction in flight hours for any prior flight training. Their reasoning was that so often they had to 'unteach' bad habits either picked up since completion of the licence, or even during training. Also, they were training for a specific standard (commercial, IFR) and some of the training is just not as relevant to that operation.
Our Air Force doesn't give any credit as far as I understand it, and the first aircraft flown by pilot trainees is the T-6. Their training goals and program is completely different to what you do for a PPL.