Italian Dewoitine D.520s

Discussion in 'Aviation' started by Sagittario64, Nov 27, 2011.

  1. Sagittario64

    Sagittario64 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2011
    Messages:
    291
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Does anyone know about the D.520's combat service history with the Regia Aeronautica? All i heard was that 60 were recieved in 1943 and they were used as interceptors in Northern Italy. Is there anything more specific about the combats they took part in?
     
  2. le_steph40

    le_steph40 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2011
    Messages:
    1,315
    Likes Received:
    77
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Research and development automotive wiring systems
    Location:
    South West of France
    Home Page:
    Ratings:
    +97 / 0 / -2
  3. Sagittario64

    Sagittario64 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2011
    Messages:
    291
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    well yes i read the wiki and i liked the other site you referred me to, but im interested in hearing about how the pilots fought in the dewoitines, since they were different from native italian fighters, namely with the better armament
     
  4. davebender

    davebender Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2009
    Messages:
    6,426
    Likes Received:
    71
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Michigan, USA
    Ratings:
    +86 / 0 / -0
    Seems hardly worth the bother if the D.520s were powered by Hs12Y engines. But I suppose if you are desperate for aircraft anything is worth a try.
     
  5. Sagittario64

    Sagittario64 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2011
    Messages:
    291
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    I think they used them mainly because of the cannon. which is better equipped to take down a four engined bomber, a C.202, or a D.520?
     
  6. davebender

    davebender Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2009
    Messages:
    6,426
    Likes Received:
    71
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Michigan, USA
    Ratings:
    +86 / 0 / -0
    1943 Germany was producing the superior Mg151/20 cannon like hot rolls. Why didn't Italy just import a few hundred?
     
  7. Sagittario64

    Sagittario64 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2011
    Messages:
    291
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    They did. the put them on some Re.2001s, and were the core armament of all the 5 series fighters. im saying that there were less than 200 n5 series fighters around during mid early 1943. and the heavies were starting to pound north italy. they needed a WELL ARMED fighter to fight them, and that couldnt be provided by the C.202s(1=2 x 12.7mm MG) and Re.2001s(2 x 12.7mm MG, 2 x 7.92mm MG), the only italian fighters in service in any reasonable quantity at the time. the D.520(1 x 20mm cannon, 4 x 7.5mm MG) was i think the best solution at the time, because basically they were bargained for with useless captured french bombers, which i think was the smartest trade itlay ever made during the war, and the most generous one germany had with italy
     
  8. Sagittario64

    Sagittario64 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2011
    Messages:
    291
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Plus i think the 151/20 factories were being hard pressed for massive orders from the luftwaffe. me.410s(2 x 151/20s), fw.190s(4 x 151/20s), bf.109s(1 or 3 x 151/20s), and the many other types that used the 20mm cannon were being produced like rabbits. just think, 1 fw.190 requires 4 151/20s. 10 fw.190s equals 40 151/20s. anyways i think the italians just needed a cannon armed interceptor that they could get numberws of really fast, something only a weapons deal could do.
     
  9. Shortround6

    Shortround6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2009
    Messages:
    10,737
    Likes Received:
    1,102
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired Firefighter
    Location:
    Central Florida Highlands
    Ratings:
    +1,627 / 1 / -1
    Unless they were modified the D 520s armament was rather dated by 1943. I like the Hispano gun but a 60 round drum (6 seconds firing time) in 1943 doesn't make for much of a bomber interceptor.
     
  10. Sagittario64

    Sagittario64 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2011
    Messages:
    291
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    #10 Sagittario64, Nov 28, 2011
    Last edited: Nov 28, 2011
    Their armament was still better than italy's mainline fighters at the time, regardless of how old the d.520 was. it was simply the best short term solution for italy, aside from maybe those bf.109 importations from germany. besides the french machine guns were still pretty good by 1943. they had a rather high rate of fire, and could put a lot of bullets on the target very quickly
     
  11. Sagittario64

    Sagittario64 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2011
    Messages:
    291
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    I know this thread is somewhat dead but i did find this really cool artwork. i wish i knew the artist's name because i want to congratulate him/her on this very fine piece of artwork
    [​IMG]
     
Loading...

Share This Page