J29 v F86 v Mig 15

Discussion in 'Post-War' started by Lucky13, Apr 23, 2009.

  1. Lucky13

    Lucky13 Forum Mascot

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    36,727
    Likes Received:
    1,064
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Nightshift picker
    Location:
    A Swede living in Glasgow, Scotland
    Home Page:
    Who come out on top of these three?
     
  2. FLYBOYJ

    FLYBOYJ "THE GREAT GAZOO"
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2005
    Messages:
    23,199
    Likes Received:
    784
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Aircraft Maintenance Manager/ Flight Instructor
    Location:
    Colorado, USA
    Depending on the model of F-86, the Sabre hands down. the J-29 is a close second and the MiG-15 a close 3rd. All 3 aircraft are competative but I give the slight edge to the Sabre, espeically the Canadair built ones.
     
  3. Lucky13

    Lucky13 Forum Mascot

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    36,727
    Likes Received:
    1,064
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Nightshift picker
    Location:
    A Swede living in Glasgow, Scotland
    Home Page:
    The J29F got an afterburner to its Ghost engine in '54 me think, how would that tip the scale?
     
  4. FLYBOYJ

    FLYBOYJ "THE GREAT GAZOO"
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2005
    Messages:
    23,199
    Likes Received:
    784
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Aircraft Maintenance Manager/ Flight Instructor
    Location:
    Colorado, USA
    That gave it some benifits in acceleration, but even with AB I think the J-47 and orenda Sabers still put out about 1500 pounds more thrust and were still between 20 -30 mph faster. I also think the Saber had longer legs, but then again, the J29 was designed as an interceptor with limited ground strike capability.
     
  5. Lucky13

    Lucky13 Forum Mascot

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    36,727
    Likes Received:
    1,064
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Nightshift picker
    Location:
    A Swede living in Glasgow, Scotland
    Home Page:
    Have no idea about the power with those other two, the '29's engine had first a power output of 2300kp without the AB. Did ever any USAF or such fly the '29 for comparison, do you know?

    Edit: '29 with afterburner 2800kp....
     
  6. tomo pauk

    tomo pauk Creator of Interesting Threads

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2008
    Messages:
    7,989
    Likes Received:
    434
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Mig-15, hands down.
     
  7. Graeme

    Graeme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    Messages:
    2,716
    Likes Received:
    166
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    G'day Joe. 'We' (popular Australian publications) tend to regard the Mk.30-32 Avon (7,500st) Sabre as the "Ultimate Sabre" but I have my doubts. What are your thoughts?

    [​IMG]
     
  8. Glider

    Glider Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2005
    Messages:
    6,160
    Likes Received:
    128
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Consellor
    Location:
    Lincolnshire
    As others have stated its close between them and none would be a walkover. If I had to pick then it would be the Sabre for its all round ability.

    For looks the J29, I know its a bit quirky but then I can do quirky.

    My wife was terrified that I would buy the original Fiat Multipla which says it all.
     
  9. FLYBOYJ

    FLYBOYJ "THE GREAT GAZOO"
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2005
    Messages:
    23,199
    Likes Received:
    784
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Aircraft Maintenance Manager/ Flight Instructor
    Location:
    Colorado, USA
    And your basis?

    The MiG-15 was technically inferior to the F-86 and was out flown by the Sabre at many altitudes. The only distinct advantage the MiG-15 had over both aircraft was its weight and ability to accelerate. This was all but eliminated by the later model Canadair Sabers.
     
  10. FLYBOYJ

    FLYBOYJ "THE GREAT GAZOO"
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2005
    Messages:
    23,199
    Likes Received:
    784
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Aircraft Maintenance Manager/ Flight Instructor
    Location:
    Colorado, USA
    I agree and I was eventually was going to bring that up - we had discussions ablt that a few years ago here. I think the Avon Sabres were the peak of the design and not only optimized performance but armament as well.
     
  11. Lucky13

    Lucky13 Forum Mascot

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    36,727
    Likes Received:
    1,064
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Nightshift picker
    Location:
    A Swede living in Glasgow, Scotland
    Home Page:
    Was the Sabre longer legs on internal fuel only? Saw that it had about 1540 km longer range, than the '29. Would I be wrong in thinking that it was with drop tanks? The '29 range was 1100 km.
     
  12. FLYBOYJ

    FLYBOYJ "THE GREAT GAZOO"
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2005
    Messages:
    23,199
    Likes Received:
    784
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Aircraft Maintenance Manager/ Flight Instructor
    Location:
    Colorado, USA
    I think range with internal tanks for the F-86 was about 760 miles. With drop tanks, about 1200 miles.
     
  13. Lucky13

    Lucky13 Forum Mascot

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    36,727
    Likes Received:
    1,064
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Nightshift picker
    Location:
    A Swede living in Glasgow, Scotland
    Home Page:
    That would be 1223km and 1931km....

    Tunnan was 1100km without external fuel. You had two different drop tanks which gave another extra 800 or 1000 L...(106 US gallon) or (132 US gallon)
    Can't seem to find the range with drop tanks. :oops:
     
  14. Messy1

    Messy1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2007
    Messages:
    2,708
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Occupation:
    Sales for Karl Performance
    Location:
    Ankeny, Iowa
    Home Page:
    The Sabre was made better by continually being updated. Were improvements and updates applied to the MIG 15 through out it's life to keep it on par with the Sabre? I know the Sabre was continually improved and updated over the course of it's service life. But did the Soviets improve the MIG along the same lines?
     
  15. Glider

    Glider Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2005
    Messages:
    6,160
    Likes Received:
    128
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Consellor
    Location:
    Lincolnshire
    The Mig 15 was updated to a Mig 15 BIS, but when comparing it to the later versions of the Sabre the Mig 17 might well be considered an enhancement to the Mig 15 as it entered service in 1953/4.
     
  16. tomo pauk

    tomo pauk Creator of Interesting Threads

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2008
    Messages:
    7,989
    Likes Received:
    434
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I like the cannons, light weight and high altitude performance. The things MiG-15 lacked were rectified by -15bis and -17.
     
  17. FLYBOYJ

    FLYBOYJ "THE GREAT GAZOO"
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2005
    Messages:
    23,199
    Likes Received:
    784
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Aircraft Maintenance Manager/ Flight Instructor
    Location:
    Colorado, USA
    The high altitude performance of the -15Bis was checked by later model F-86s. BTW, most of the MiGs over Korea were 15Bis and they didn't fare well even by conservative numbers (I think JoeB may jump in). The MiGs armament was meant to kill bombers and although leathal, did not have good long range velocity and pilots reported the the rounds actually "arcing" when fired at long range targets. The MiG-17 was only slightly faster than the later model Canadair Sabres and Navy Furies and was the same speed as Avon Powered Sabres.
     
  18. comiso90

    comiso90 Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2006
    Messages:
    3,672
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Video and multi-media communications expert
    Location:
    FL
    I've read accounts from both proponents and detractors of the Sabre's computer assisted gun sights. when used properly the F-86's gunsight was murderously effective.

    also American G-suits were were more commonly used then the NK counterparts. Sometimes it's difficult to compare Plane vs plane w/o considering the complete weapons system and doctrine.

    here is a good page on F-86 vs Mig 15

    Korean War Jet Fighters, MiG-15 vs. Sabre F-86: Which Was Better?

    .
     
  19. HoHun

    HoHun Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2006
    Messages:
    1,766
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Hi Flyboyj,

    >The MiGs armament was meant to kill bombers and although leathal, did not have good long range velocity and pilots reported the the rounds actually "arcing" when fired at long range targets.

    Actually, I don't think there is any evidence the MiG armament was meant to kill bombers:

    Prevedena inačica http://okirillov.tripod.com/data/rastr/Spravka.htma

    If you check the above link, the MiG-15 armament seems to have been designed as all-purpose armament with the 23 mm being selected as superior anti-fighter weapon, and the 37 mm cannon as the superior anti-bomber weapon that still retained good anti-fighter capabilities. After all, the Soviets had installed cannon of up to 57 mm calibre in single-engined fighters, and they had flown at least calibres of up to 37 mm, perhaps even 45 mm in combat in WW2 ...

    Regards,

    Henning (HoHun)
     
  20. The Basket

    The Basket Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2007
    Messages:
    1,318
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I think the MiG-17 has to be added if your adding late model Sabres
     
Loading...

Share This Page