Japanese interceptors/fighters, fav?

Discussion in 'Polls' started by carpenoctem1689, Sep 10, 2005.

?

Which would you rather fly in defence of home territory?

  1. A6M

    7.7%
  2. Ki-43

    7.7%
  3. Ki-44

    15.4%
  4. Ki-84

    53.8%
  5. Other before 1944

    15.4%
  1. carpenoctem1689

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2005
    Messages:
    286
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Occupation:
    Student
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    It would seem that the mindset here would be ETO aircraft deserve the most discussion, because i see a serious lack of PTO discussions. So in a most likely vein attempt, ill try and discuss some Japanese fighters and interceptors.

    Early on in the war, the japanese had few, if any high altitude fighters and interceptors. The vaunted zero, had only a top speed of 332 MPH at 14,390 ft, and with altitude above this, performance slowly decreased. It did not have the amrament to deal with bombers of four engine configuration, and had trouble with twin engine bombers/fighters. It had a meager ceiling of 32,810 ft, rendering it definitly not the best high altitude aircraft. however this can be forgiven, due to the fact its meant as an escort fighter/fighter.

    The Ki-43 was a close resemblance to the zero, being a medium atltitude fighter, and not a high level interceptor. Manoeverability was very good, but armament was a meager two 12.7 mm nose mounted machine guns. it had a top speed of 329 MPH at 13,125 ft, and above that, performance gradually decreased. Its ceiling was slightly improved over the zero, topping out at 36,750 ft.

    The Ki-44 fared a little better in the higher altitude battles that would ensue in the PTO. It had a top speed of 375 MPH at 17,105 ft, an improvement over the A6M, and the Ki-43. It had a ceiling of 36,842 ft, and an armament of four machine guns. Like the previous two aircraft it had a range of over 1000 miles, and could loiter, or escort.

    The Ki-84 was an aircraft much more suited to the interceptor role. with a top speed of 390 MPH at 20,131 ft, it could finally put speed and alititude somewhat together. it had a ceiling of 34,540 ft, and again a range of over 1000 miles, giving it loiter and escort ability. With an armament of two 20mm cannon, and two machine guns, it was too lightly armed to truly tackle the large, four engined bombers, like the b-17 and the b-24, and would have trouble with the b-25, b-26. However it still was better than the A6M, sporting 12.7mm Ho-103 machine guns, instead of 7.92mm ones.
     
  2. syscom3

    syscom3 Pacific Historian

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2005
    Messages:
    12,647
    Likes Received:
    322
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    Ratings:
    +370 / 0 / -1
    Why not include the other fighters that had some potential, like the Raiden or Tony?
     
  3. carpenoctem1689

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2005
    Messages:
    286
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Occupation:
    Student
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    i simply ran out of room...it wouldnt let me type anymore...though the raiden would have been one of my favorite choices, even though it was plagued by troubles, mostly engine related.
     
  4. evangilder

    evangilder "Shooter"
    Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2004
    Messages:
    19,375
    Likes Received:
    140
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Network Engineer/Photographer
    Location:
    Moorpark, CA
    Home Page:
    Ratings:
    +150 / 0 / -0
    There is a thread for polls, can you please post these into the polls thread? Thanks.
     
  5. carpenoctem1689

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2005
    Messages:
    286
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Occupation:
    Student
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Im sorry, im new here today, and i just now noticed the polls board, will do from now on, and i apologize.
     
  6. carpenoctem1689

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2005
    Messages:
    286
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Occupation:
    Student
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    I tried to post a poll, but it said only moderators could? can i have a little help here?
     
  7. Wildcat

    Wildcat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2005
    Messages:
    8,950
    Likes Received:
    388
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Workin' for the man....
    Location:
    South East Queensland
    Ratings:
    +465 / 1 / -1
    Well I'm a fan of the Zero so my vote goes to it.
     
  8. lesofprimus

    lesofprimus Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Messages:
    19,111
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Communications
    Location:
    Long Island Native in Mississippi
    Home Page:
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0 / -1
    U can list up to 15 selections for ur poll.........
     
  9. JCS

    JCS Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    672
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Occupation:
    United States Marine
    Location:
    Nicholson, PA
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Well, the Ki27 is my favorite fighter (Second only to the Bf109), so I voted for "Other before 1944".
     
  10. DerAdlerIstGelandet

    DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crew Chief
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    42,039
    Likes Received:
    867
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    USA/Germany
    Ratings:
    +1,132 / 0 / -3
    I would not go for any of those fighters up there. I am not impressed with really any of the Japanese fighters. The Zero was an overated myth. I do like the Tony and the Raiden though.
     
  11. FLYBOYJ

    FLYBOYJ "THE GREAT GAZOO"
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2005
    Messages:
    23,368
    Likes Received:
    894
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Aircraft Maintenance Manager/ Flight Instructor
    Location:
    Colorado, USA
    Ratings:
    +1,132 / 2 / -4
    Tony, Raiden and KI-88
     
  12. Glider

    Glider Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2005
    Messages:
    6,265
    Likes Received:
    150
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Consellor
    Location:
    Lincolnshire
    Ratings:
    +219 / 1 / -0
    Ki100 not on the list or the Ki84 if you want one on the list.
     
  13. carpenoctem1689

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2005
    Messages:
    286
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Occupation:
    Student
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    forgive the lack of options in the poll...im new and just now learning, thanks for the information on my mistakes, and thanks for answering my poll though.
     
  14. DerAdlerIstGelandet

    DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crew Chief
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    42,039
    Likes Received:
    867
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    USA/Germany
    Ratings:
    +1,132 / 0 / -3
    No problem you will learn the ropes my friend.
     
  15. cheddar cheese

    cheddar cheese Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    20,316
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    WSM, England
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0
  16. DerAdlerIstGelandet

    DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crew Chief
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    42,039
    Likes Received:
    867
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    USA/Germany
    Ratings:
    +1,132 / 0 / -3
    Of Japenese aircraft I would go with the same CC.
     
  17. cheddar cheese

    cheddar cheese Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    20,316
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    WSM, England
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    Yeah, after doing a bit of reading up on it I found it was a very capable aircraft...
     
  18. DerAdlerIstGelandet

    DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crew Chief
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    42,039
    Likes Received:
    867
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    USA/Germany
    Ratings:
    +1,132 / 0 / -3
    The Japanese were very capable of making quality aircraft I think they were just lacking raw materials more than Germany was and they made similar mistakes as the Germans did.
     
  19. cheddar cheese

    cheddar cheese Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    20,316
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    WSM, England
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    Yep, the Raiden was supposed to be in service in late 42/early 43 but due to numourous problems (mainly engine) they werent in frontline service til late 44 at the earliest.
     
  20. Jabberwocky

    Jabberwocky Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2005
    Messages:
    1,090
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Teacher
    Location:
    Japan
    Ratings:
    +16 / 0 / -0
    What about a N1K2-J Shiden-kai?

    1,990 hp engine, 4 20mms and that crazy automatic manuvering system that they put on it.
     
Loading...

Share This Page