Language in Europe

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Marcel

rotartsinimdA
Staff
Admin
Mod
10,991
5,352
Sep 19, 2006
Dordrecht
www.redbeatband.nl
The European Commission has just announced an agreement whereby English will be the official language of the European Union rather than German, which was the other possibility. As part of the negotiations, the British Government conceded that English spelling had some room for improvement and has accepted a 5-year phase-in plan that would become known as "Euro-English". In the first year, "s" will replace the soft "c". Sertainly, this will make the sivil servants jump with joy. The hard "c" will be dropped in favour of "k". This should klear up konfusion, and keyboards kan have one less letter. There will be growing publik enthusiasm in the sekond year when the troublesome "ph" will be replaced with "f". This will make words like fotograf 20% shorter. In the 3rd year, publik akseptanse of the new spelling kan be expekted to reach the stage where more komplikated changes are possible. Governments will enkourage the removal of double letters which have always ben a deterent to akurate speling. Also, al wil agre that the horibl mes of the silent "e" in the languag is disgrasful and it should go away. By the 4th yer people wil be reseptiv to steps such as replasing "th" with "z" and "w" with "v". During ze fifz yer, ze unesesary "o" kan be dropd from vords kontaining "ou" and after ziz fifz yer, ve vil hav a reil sensibl riten styl. Zer vil be no mor trubl or difikultis and evrivun vil find it ezi tu understand ech oza. Ze drem of a united urop vil finali kum tru. Und efter ze fifz yer, ve vil al be speking German like zey vunted in ze forst plas.
 
Similar to what Mark Twain wrote...


"For example, in Year 1 that useless letter "c" would be dropped to be replased either by "k" or "s", and likewise "x" would no longer be part of the alphabet. The only kase in which "c" would be retained would be the "ch" formation, which will be dealt with later. Year 2 might reform "w" spelling, so that "which" and "one" would take the same konsonant, wile Year 3 might well abolish "y" replasing it with "i" and iear 4 might fiks the "g/j" anomali wonse and for all.
Generally, then, the improvement would kontinue iear bai iear with iear 5 doing awai with useless double konsonants, and iears 6-12 or so modifaiing vowlz and the rimeiniing voist and unvoist konsonants. Bai iear 15 or sou, it wud fainali bi posibl tu meik ius ov thi ridandant letez "c", "y" and "x"—bai now jast a memori in the maindz ov ould doderez —tu riplais "ch", "sh", and "th" rispektivili. Fainali, xen, aafte sam 20 iers ov orxogrefkl riform, wi wud hev a lojikl, kohirnt speling in ius xrewawt xe Ingliy-spiking werld
 
I wuz thinking the sam thing. Haf the wurdz we sa hav stupid ekstra letterz we dont ned.
Eksept maybe to e's for a long e sound and ou in sound and voul. I kan understand riting
this way. Wat do u think?- Jon
 
Is the "s" or the "c" silent in the word scent?
Obviously the "S" otherwise it would be cent or the "C" otherwise it would be sent. A word on its own has no context and doesn't make sense or have to, it is only when placed in a sentence that you know what it means. Its the same in all languages, that's why I couldn't eat in a Japanese restaurant, I hadn't learned the inflexion difference between chop sticks and a suspension bridge. I don't know why any waitress would think I would need a suspension bridge when I have a plate of noodles and no chop sticks, but I am not Japanese. Maybe Shinpachi could educate me?
 
3. Context... Yeah, I mean, you wouldn't be sitting in a restaurant asking the waiter for another suspension bridge since you dropped one of yours on the ground...
 

Users who are viewing this thread