P-39 Performance Thread

This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Steven Que

Airman
39
0
Oct 26, 2007
Taiwan
Hi Micdrow
I like these data of aircraft because it is very detail.
But in this forum I think P-39 may not popular aircraft for many members.
No reply for these P-39 data still now.

But I am sure someone like P-39 and they will amazing these data.

good luck:)
 

Ernst

Airman
28
0
May 4, 2009
I think this threads would be usefull to post together the better info about an aircraft. This works great as a quick reference.

This way is perfectly understandable the need of such posts! It ll be insteresting to have threads about less popular aircraft too containing a compilation of the better sources. An idea is close the topic for comments (only admins post)!

A quick, quality and clean reference source. :lol:
 

Ernst

Airman
28
0
May 4, 2009
Once I acessed a post containing a video of how to fly Aircobra P-39. It was a manual made by USAAF or by Bell factory about the right way to handle the aircraft. Very nice! Since then I did not find it anymore.

I tried to use the search tools but it was unsucessfull!
 

Micdrow

“Archive”
10,447
3,607
Aug 21, 2006
Wisconsin
Ive noticed more and more training video's coming on the web, wondering if it wouldnt be a bad idea to add a video training manual area or add them to existing manuals about certain aircraft. hummmm!!!!
 

rogerwilko

Airman 1st Class
102
14
Mar 5, 2009
You're welcome Ernst. Did you find the quality a liitle lacking. It used to be better but i guess he wants us to pay for the better quality.
 

Hunterbunter

Airman
15
0
Jun 15, 2007
Wind tunnel testing for pitch stability P-39N-1
 

Attachments

  • Longitudinal control and stability for P-39N-1.pdf
    6.5 MB · Views: 303

fibus

Airman
55
0
Jun 28, 2009
Yeager has said no one could beat a p39 at 100 feet. But no one wants to fight at that altitude.
Winkle Brown enjoyed flying the airplane for sheer pleasure more than any other piston engine airplane.
 

alejandro_

Airman 1st Class
281
56
Jul 4, 2005
I am trying to compare speed and climb rate performance for P-39, especially for versions deployed in late 1942 and early 1943. I got these data:

Íîâàÿ ñòðàíèöà 1

But there is no similar climb performance. I have looked around and I cannot find anything except in WWII Aircraft Performance, but I the data are hard to read. Can anyone post something similar?
 
Last edited:

Greyman

Tech Sergeant
1,783
1,430
Jan 31, 2009
I am trying to compare speed and climb rate performance for P-39, especially for versions deployed in late 1942 and early 1943.

I have a British (A&AEE) tests of:

Airacobra AH-573
7,830 pounds
Allison V-1710-E4
2600 rpm
37.2 inches of Hg.

2,000 feet - 2040 feet per minute
10,300 feet - 2040 feet per minute (critical altitude)
16,000 feet - 1385 feet per minute
22,000 feet - 795 feet per minute
29,000 feet - 120 feet per minute
 

CORSNING

Tech Sergeant
1,630
980
Dec 24, 2008
Clyde, Ohio
Greyman,
Try wwiiaircraftperformance.com. Go to P-38 and scroll to the bottom. Look on the fighter comparison chart for the P-39N. It opened my eye. Speed 397mph. and Climb 4,400fpm. Not too shabby.
 

krieghund

Senior Airman
610
41
Sep 25, 2006
Riyadh
I thought this would be the right spot for these documents. Enjoy!
 

Attachments

  • TurboNACA.bmp
    1.4 MB · Views: 303
  • Review of drag cleanup tests in Langley full-scale tunnel 1945 applicable to current general avi.pdf
    8.9 MB · Views: 400
  • naca-wr-l-489(XP39).pdf
    5.7 MB · Views: 306

Users who are viewing this thread