Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
I went out to the Edwards airshow around 1980 and saw the "flying mockup" of that lifting body; it was made out of plywood. I think it was limited to tow tests.Well if we're talking lifting bodies (NASA image):
M2-F1; it was used for ground-based tow testing, and later it was air-towed using an R4D.I went out to the Edwards airshow around 1980 and saw the "flying mockup" of that lifting body; it was made out of plywood. I think it was limited to tow tests.
What about R2D2? Valid questionM2-F1; it was used for ground-based tow testing, and later it was air-towed using an R4D.
I went out to the Edwards airshow around 1980 and saw the "flying mockup" of that lifting body; it was made out of plywood. I think it was limited to tow tests.
In the late 60's everyone assumed that the next manned spacecraft would be a lifting body. But when the decision was made to build the Space Shuttle, NASA was desperate to envelope ALL space launch requirements with the Shuttle and enable it to be the ONLY launch system used by the US. That meant they had to include USAF polar orbit launches out of Vandenberg AFB. The most popular orbits out of VAFB are Sun Synchronous, and that requires a trajectory that is actually a bit West of due South. And due to the rotation of the Earth, that meant if the Shuttle had to abort and land on the first orbit it would be coming down thousands of miles West of the West Coast of the US, with no place to land. Scott Manly has said that he found a USAF mission requirement for a once-around mission but in reality given that the Shuttle was manned it HAD to be able to land on the first orbit in case of a life support problem or a medical concern for crew members. That meant the Shuttle had to have wings, so it could glide in the atmosphere and reach the West Coast. And in turn that made the vehicle much larger, heavier, more expensive, and less viable as a space booster. The Shuttle as conceived was not a very good idea but making it "One Size Fits All" was utterly disastrous.
F-8C VF-84 USS Independence
Nice Hurky bird.View attachment 817032
The source: the Internet.
Last time I saw one was in the vicinity of Sainte-Mère to commemorate D-Day 94 by dropping paras from the 75th Rangers.
Fire that lot at the same time and there is a fighting chance she would go backwards.
Before they phased out the C-141B they had to reduce its allowable maximum altitude due to concerns over fuselage structural fatigue.C-141B. As I recall they did all the stretching and added A/R and than it would seem that they pulled ten more years and the C-17 blew the 141B away.