Small Messerschmitt

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Stevenbrown

Recruit
7
11
May 26, 2016
A nice look at how slim the early bf109 was.
 

Attachments

  • D76121C6-367A-4B5B-BB5B-240937AD33F7.jpeg
    D76121C6-367A-4B5B-BB5B-240937AD33F7.jpeg
    65.8 KB · Views: 155
The later G-models really did stretch the aerodynamics of the breed while simultaneously doing nothing for its looks. The 'beule' bumps on the upper cowls howsing big gun breeches, bulges in the wing upper surfaces to accommodate a thicker tyre, cannon in canoe fairings under the wings and a drop tank all introduced drag, which the designers compensated with water meth and nitrous injection, but the petite wee fighter had reached its zenith already and its performance was steadily eclipsed by the likes of P-51s and Griffon engined Spitfires. The 'K brought back a measure of superiority to the design, but it was too little too late.
 
There were aircraft as slim or slimmer. I'd say almost all of the the inline-powered planes were unless they had an annular/drum radiator at the nose, Dora/Ta 152.
 
A nice look at how slim the early bf109 was.
I'm not sure how the Flieger fit inside there. But, I mean, there are probably smaller cockpits and all that. I would probably be freaking out from claustrophobia, to be honest. Early Bf.109s were slim as hell though.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back