Spitfire Mk9

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

I don't know why, but for me early marks of Spitfire (especially Mk II) looked much more nicer and more graceful then the later marks. I don't like the looks of enlarged and pointed out tail surfaces and shape of the nose with Griffon engine. Of course I'm talking just from aesthetic point of view and I am fully aware of higher performace of later marks.

But still... one way or the other Spitfire was beautiful airplane and these pictures are excellent too. Thanks for posting!
 

Users who are viewing this thread