The Best Assault Rifle.

Which One the


  • Total voters
    48

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

I would agree that the M-16 was not enough. It would sometimes take several hits to put a man down and I always seemed to get one that had a tendency to jam. Usually a quick pull on the charging handle would clear it, but that is precious time when you are under fire.
 
The M-16/M-4 to me seems like a SWAT weapon for raiding a building, not a combat infantry weapon. And i would only give the SWAT designation because the M-4 is more compact than the AK-47, and you can attach american scopes (infrared, Night vision). I dont know if the U.S produces ones that could fit easily to an AK-47. The ammunition is simply not big enough to take an enemy down in a single hit most of the time. Some guys dont fall after a hit from an M-16, but if you see someone hit by an AK-47, there ass goes down. The reason the M-16, or one of the reasons, was because they changed from ball, to stick powder, which in the moist atmosphere of vietnam, would expand the shell, and jam it in the barrel/breech, making the weapon useless. Therefore many soldiers wouldnt leave a round chambered for fear of just that happening.
 
I posted this somewhere else, but I cant remember, so bear with my repeat....

My brother entered the Army in 1966 and did 2 tours in Vietnam with the 82nd Airborne, he spent time in the Ashore Valley and at a fire base outside of Hue. He used the M-14 and M-16 and he actually preferred the -14 although he said he learned very quickly to keep his M-16 clean at all times. He said he thought the M-16 unreliability claims were a bit exaggerated and felt a solder who wasn't lazy and kept his weapon clean had nothing to worry about. He also said during his tour it was dangerous to use a captured AK-47s as you could draw fire to your position from friendlies due to the AKs sound when fired. He thought the AK was a good weapon but not as accurate as an M-16. In his last months in Viet Nam (early 1969) he was involved in some real close in combat and managed to acquire a Mossberg shotgun. He said that was very effective!!!!
 
As I recall, the first M-16's were advertised as "self-cleaning", weren't they? Therefore a lot of grunts took it quite literally and never bothered to clean the damn things. Hence, it jammed a lot and quickly earned a bad rep because of it. That would gum up any rifle.
Then of course you had the issue of the bolt not always closing all the way when the weapon was charged, which necessitated the addition of the forward bolt assist on subsequent models, including the Canadian C7 and C8.
 
I do know that oen of the things that helped for us when in the field was to never completely fill a clip. 25 round clip...23-24 rounds. Leave them full and the spring got weak. Then the round misfeeds at the most inopportune time and you have a problem!
 
evangilder said:
I do know that oen of the things that helped for us when in the field was to never completely fill a clip. 25 round clip...23-24 rounds. Leave them full and the spring got weak. Then the round misfeeds at the most inopportune time and you have a problem!

That or to regularly empty your clip and streach the spring. That keeps that from happening and then you can keep a full clip. Atleat that is what I did with my 9mm so that I could keep 15 rounds in each clip. Doing this I never had a problem The guys that did not do this, had the same problem that you are talking about there.
 
I really love the FN-FAL, heavy punch of the 308 and light weight.

Steyr%20AUG%20FAA%20y%20FAL%20de%20la%20Ca%20Cdos(s)%20601_JPG.jpg
 
Similar to your story flyboy, I had a 2nd Cousin to serve in Vietnam.
He said to stay alive you had to keep your M-16 clean at all times! He actually trained with an M-14 at BT but just they got over there, they were thrown an M-16. He said that the M-14 was good but had a tough kickback. He said when you knew how to fire the M-16 at a ceratin angle, he could be very useful.
 
lesofprimus said:
For close quarter combat, the MP-5 is damn near unbeatable.... God I love that weapon..

I know zip about modern weaponry Les ( infact the last weapon I fired was a replica Colt single action peacemaker) but according to the figures on Heckler's web site if 50 countries use the MP5's it must indicate that its a good weapon.
I'm suprised Heckler Koch survived after Royal Ordinance went tits up as normally its the oveseas companies that go to the wall first, but I suppose having such a good product line it had little effect on sales and if its true that the G36 is going to replace the SA80 it serves RO right for giving up the company. Typical British dont know when their breads buttered they recently gave up Smith Wesson control as well the knobnuts.
 
It's my understanding that when the M-16 first came out it used one type of powder that worked fine. When it was ordered the powder was changed to a more powerful ball type powder which left a residue. To counter the residue problem the reciever/bolt/chamber was to be chromed. Macnamara, who knew everything, rejected the chrome because it cost something like $1.62 per rifle and was not needed. Once they were chromed the reliability and jamming problems stopped. My uncle was in nam in 68/69 He said on more than one occasion they used anything at hand to keep their M-16s clean.

wmaxt
 
That 'Ball" powder caused such a problem because it was meant for slightly larger calibers. by the time the decision to chrome the rifle 'guts' Macnamara was out of office, It was Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfield that made that stunned decision.
 
Nonskimmer said:
The Germans bought Heckler Koch back from Royal Ordinance in 2000, didn't they?

That is my understanding also. I know a friend of mine had a meeting with managment about starting a job and the managment was German. So I believe you are correct.
 
You don't know about what you talkthe i have 2 of the bet assault rifle

the fal as steyr 58 never jamming and capable of a accurracy of 3 to
4 inch without scope on 100 m distance

the second the sar galil in .223 for the moment the best assault rifle
never jammed and a very good accuracy on 100m 4 to 5 inch on 100m


regards

rikdil lopez
 
Don't worry, Eric, he's Belgian ... they can't be blamed for their handicap.

In the words of Monty Python; "Let's not think of a name for the Belgians, let's just ignore them!" - "I cannot think of a worse name than Belgian." - "But the best is, lazy fat Belgian bastards!" :lol:

Sorry, welcome to the forum. Don't worry, I have nothing against Belgium specifically.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back