I have heard the rationale behind including multiple crew in this class of fighter; to operate longer ranged, bomber style radio sets and man defensive guns. However, for a non pilot such as myself, this seems like a poor trade off. The additional size of the airframe and weight of the equipment appears difficult to justify for planes defined primarily as fighters.
Before WWII it seems most people understood single, hand held, rifle caliber machine guns were of limited defensive value. Fitting every plane with a comprehensive radio set also seems expensive and dubious. For example the Japanese, even thougth they joined the bandwagon of developing multiseat fighters, actually relied on long range single engine planes which stuck by the bombers for navigation.
However, I never assume people in the past were just foolish. So my question is, what exactly did these additional aircrew contribute and, given the technology of the time, how valuable was this? Anyone with piloting experience or knowledge of the German requirements wish to help dispell my ignorance?
Before WWII it seems most people understood single, hand held, rifle caliber machine guns were of limited defensive value. Fitting every plane with a comprehensive radio set also seems expensive and dubious. For example the Japanese, even thougth they joined the bandwagon of developing multiseat fighters, actually relied on long range single engine planes which stuck by the bombers for navigation.
However, I never assume people in the past were just foolish. So my question is, what exactly did these additional aircrew contribute and, given the technology of the time, how valuable was this? Anyone with piloting experience or knowledge of the German requirements wish to help dispell my ignorance?