The "Wannabe" Skyraiders

Discussion in 'Polls' started by Thud-Dud89, Dec 31, 2016.

?

Which of the US Navy's attack aircraft, excluding the Skyraider was best?

This poll will close on Jan 31, 2017 at 10:56 AM.
  1. Martin AM Mauler

    80.0%
  2. Grumman AF Guardian

    10.0%
  3. Kaiser-Fleetwings XBTK

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. Boeing XF8B

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. Curtiss XBTC

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  6. Curtiss XBT2C

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  7. Douglas XTB2D Skypirate/Devastator II

    10.0%
  8. Douglas XSB2D/XBTD Destroyer

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  9. Other (Comment)

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. Thud-Dud89

    Thud-Dud89 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2015
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Of the USN single-engined bomber aircraft that were NOT the Douglas AD/A-1, which do you think might have been the next best choice for the role? I'm including the Martin AM Mauler and Grumman AF Guardian in this, though they DID see service, the others, not so much...
     
  2. GrauGeist

    GrauGeist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2008
    Messages:
    15,403
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Public Safety Automotive Technician
    Location:
    Redding, California
    Home Page:
    If not the Skyraider, then it would have to be the F4U...forget the rest. :lol:
     
  3. Thud-Dud89

    Thud-Dud89 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2015
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Sorry, I really should have made what I meant clear... Nothing against the Corsair, but it was a fighter turned into a bomber/attacker. I also meant to include only the Late WWII attackers and early Postwar attack aircraft, ie only the planes that could have or were entering service alongside the Skyraider. Again, nothing against planes from before that time period, like the F4U or the SB2C.
     
  4. FLYBOYJ

    FLYBOYJ "THE GREAT GAZOO"
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2005
    Messages:
    23,270
    Likes Received:
    825
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Aircraft Maintenance Manager/ Flight Instructor
    Location:
    Colorado, USA
    The Martin Mauler was the only one up there that was actually deployed in an attack role. It looked good on paper but was troublesome IIRC

    The Grumman Guardian was an ASW aircraft
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. Shortround6

    Shortround6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,957
    Likes Received:
    854
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired Firefighter
    Location:
    Central Florida Highlands
    Actually there was a Corsair variant specifically meant for ground attack

    The F4U-6 was re-designated the AU-1. It used a single stage two speed engine of the "C" series and performance at altitude was well below that of some of the older Corsairs.
    If it had 115/145 it looks like an exciting ride at low altitude.

    According to this: http://www.alternatewars.com/SAC/AU-1_Corsair_SAC_-_1_June_1953.pdf

    the often quoted 238mph is while it was carrying TWO 1000lb bombs, TEN 260(250?)lb bombs and one 150 gal drop tank. It was slightly faster carrying TWO 150 gal drop tanks, ONE 1000lb bomb and SIX 500lb bombs.

    A bit late for this poll being built in 1952.
     
  6. Thud-Dud89

    Thud-Dud89 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2015
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Thanks, learn something new every day!
     
  7. swampyankee

    swampyankee Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2013
    Messages:
    608
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    28
    The Martin AM-1 Mauler was certainly a highly capable aircraft, but it was also, reputedly, clumsy and difficult to operate from a carrier. Still, it was the only one to get built.
     
  8. wuzak

    wuzak Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2011
    Messages:
    4,256
    Likes Received:
    189
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Hobart Tasmania
    The XF8B was also, technically, a fighter. Hence the designation

    Xperimental Fighter 8 Boeing.
     
  9. swampyankee

    swampyankee Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2013
    Messages:
    608
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    28
    The USN and USMC, certainly by mid -WW2, were regularly using their fighters in close air support, and continued to do so post-war. The USAAF was doing the same in Europe and the Med. That said, you do get to set the parameters of your poll. We just get to disagree (and I picked the Martin Mauler).
     
Loading...

Share This Page