There are any Bf 109 K-4 in museums?
- Thread starter Jenisch
- Start date
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
GregP
Major
There are no Me 109K's anywhere in museums at this time, and none being held for restoration to any public knowledge.
There may well be one or more in private hands. If so, the existence is not known at this time.
There may well be one or more in private hands. If so, the existence is not known at this time.
A4K
Brigadier General
Wonder what happened to the Bf 109K-6 tested in the US after the war? (Though I can guess...'daddy, where is that bulldozer going?')
They tested a Bf109K of any type in the USA after the war?
That's news to me.
Only one K-6 is known to have existed,tested at Rechlin in late 1944 and that certainly didn't end up in the US. The K-6 doesn't seem to have entered production before the end of the war.
Cheers
Steve
That's news to me.
Only one K-6 is known to have existed,tested at Rechlin in late 1944 and that certainly didn't end up in the US. The K-6 doesn't seem to have entered production before the end of the war.
Cheers
Steve
A4K
Brigadier General
From 'Die Grossen Luftschlachten des Zweiten Weltkriegs' (The Great Air Battles of the Second World War):
The caption reads: 'This Bf 109K-6, tested after the war in the USA, was a bomber destroyer'. As the photo is in the section showing full development of the Bf 109 design, the designation should be correct. Note the B-29 fuselage (sans wings) in the background.
The caption reads: 'This Bf 109K-6, tested after the war in the USA, was a bomber destroyer'. As the photo is in the section showing full development of the Bf 109 design, the designation should be correct. Note the B-29 fuselage (sans wings) in the background.
That photo is of a G-10.
New Page 2
New Page 2
Indeed,and sporting a hideous non-original camouflage.
At the end of the war there was not much interest in the Bf109 which was after all an old airframe with a well known engine. Only three made it post war to The US and were initially assigned "FE" (Foreign Evaluation) numbers. Two of them also went on to receive a "T2" number which indicated the Air Intelligence organisation in the standard USAAF/USAF organisation chart.
FE-122 Bf109G-10 (WNr.611943) Later T2-122 Went to Planes of Fame
FE-123 Bf109G-10 (Unknown) Later T2-123 Patterson AFB in 1950s,fate unknown. Probably scrapped.
FE-124 Bf109G-14 (Unknown) ................. Went to USAF museum.
Earlier a couple of F-4s and a G-6 were assessed,one I think came from the Russians. These were given "EB" numbers. "EB" cunningly stood for "Engineering Branch". Before the US entered the war the British sent some aircraft for assessment and analysis. Vultee did an excellent report on the Bf110 for example.
The British selected some aircraft from the areas they controlled and assigned them "USA" numbers for allocation to US Air Technical Intelligence. Tellingly not one Bf109 is included in the total.
Confusingly some of these went to Watson's Whizzers and were assigned three digit numbers by them.For example, "USA 6" an Arado234B captured by the British in Denmark became Watson's Whizzer "303" and then "USN 121446". It's not surprising people get confused today! Others later received "FE" numbers.
Cheers
Steve
T Bolt
Colonel
The aircraft pictred is FE-123 which was probably scrapped.
FE-124 went to the USAFM and was exhibited with the fictitious werknummer 610824. I notice that The museum,who presumably know their stuff have it as a G-10 so who knows.
Noone (Prien,Rodeicke,Schmoll etc) has found any evidence that the K-6 went into production. No werknummer block has been found. The intention was to build the K-4 and K-6 in a 2:1 ratio. I'm not saying that none (apart from the one at Rechlin) were ever built,I'm just saying noone has found any!
Cheers
Steve
FE-124 went to the USAFM and was exhibited with the fictitious werknummer 610824. I notice that The museum,who presumably know their stuff have it as a G-10 so who knows.
Noone (Prien,Rodeicke,Schmoll etc) has found any evidence that the K-6 went into production. No werknummer block has been found. The intention was to build the K-4 and K-6 in a 2:1 ratio. I'm not saying that none (apart from the one at Rechlin) were ever built,I'm just saying noone has found any!
Cheers
Steve
Last edited:
- Thread starter
- #11
Talking about the Bf 109 final development, I'm wondering why the Germans had three piston fighter aircraft being developed by the war's end. Bf 109 development, Fw 190 development and the Dornier 335. Ok, the Allies also had many aircraft, but what exactly were the LW plans, shut down the production of the Bf 109 when?
Me 109 production was supposedly being shutdown after the Me 262 was up and running leaving just the Ta 152 and FW 190 but the Me 109 aircraft just kept hanging in there. The last version was likely to have been the Me 109K-14, essentially a K-4 with a DB605L engine (this had a two stage supercharger), a 4 bladed propellor and an oval engine intake to handle the higher flow rates of air. Me 109K4 likely would have received thin and perhaps scimitar propellors for greater speed at some point perhaps with perfection of the spring tabs servo tab ailerons to improved high speed roll rate.
Do 335 was a much more massive aircraft; a kind of insurance against jet failure while also capable of great range and speed. It also featured a bomb bay and could carry a second crew member for navigation and radar opperation. The Version with the DB605LA was likely good for around 490mph. It also was much more heavily armed than even the Me 262. By this stage of the war bomb aiming was either by radio navigation in most instances if that wass not possible via ntoss bombing sights like the TSA-2D
The lack of nose for mounting a centrimetric radar was overcome via the use of dielectric rod radiators radiating through the wing leading edges.
Last edited:
A4K
Brigadier General
Good stuff guys, bad mistake on the part of the book.
Seeing that port side view, she's definitely a G-10. The position of the fuel filler hatch confirms she's not a K-series aircraft, also the lack of undercarriage doors.
The only other external difference AFAIK is the position of the fuselage access hatch, which isn't visible in this heavy paint job.
Seeing that port side view, she's definitely a G-10. The position of the fuel filler hatch confirms she's not a K-series aircraft, also the lack of undercarriage doors.
The only other external difference AFAIK is the position of the fuselage access hatch, which isn't visible in this heavy paint job.
Siegfried is correct but it is difficult to be exact. The production plans changed frequently,almost every time there was a production meeting. At one time it was planned to build more than 12,000 K-4s with production continuing until March 1946.
In November 1944 the planned production of the K series at Mtt.Reg. stood at 3,598 aircraft to be delivered by July 1945. Erla was also to produce a further 2,894 K-4/R6s (all weather version) by April 1945. 2,820 of this version were also supposed to be built at WNF between May 1945 and March 1946. KOB were to produce 1,000 K-4s by June 1945 and 2,700 K-4/R6s by March 1946.
These late war production plans are pure fantasy. The reality was that a grand total of less than 1,800 Bf109Ks were built by the end of the war. With the exception of a handful at Erla (I only know of pictures of two) they were all built by Messerschmitt at Regensburg.
Cheers
Steve
In November 1944 the planned production of the K series at Mtt.Reg. stood at 3,598 aircraft to be delivered by July 1945. Erla was also to produce a further 2,894 K-4/R6s (all weather version) by April 1945. 2,820 of this version were also supposed to be built at WNF between May 1945 and March 1946. KOB were to produce 1,000 K-4s by June 1945 and 2,700 K-4/R6s by March 1946.
These late war production plans are pure fantasy. The reality was that a grand total of less than 1,800 Bf109Ks were built by the end of the war. With the exception of a handful at Erla (I only know of pictures of two) they were all built by Messerschmitt at Regensburg.
Cheers
Steve
DF loop moved back between frames 3 and 4. (An easy one.)
round metal plate above the footrest behind the wing root was deleted on the K-4. (It's obvious in a decent port side view.)
Different aileron trim tabs (hard to see admittedly!)
Probably something else i've forgotten
Don't go by the lack of U/C doors which were often removed by units.
Cheers
Steve
A4K
Brigadier General
Yeah, you're right Steve, thanks! Just checked my profiles - idiot me forgot those points!
Good heads up on the removal of the undercarriage doors too - hadn't taken that into consideration.
Cheers!
Evan
Good heads up on the removal of the undercarriage doors too - hadn't taken that into consideration.
Cheers!
Evan
Yeah, you're right Steve, thanks! Just checked my profiles - idiot me forgot those points!
Good heads up on the removal of the undercarriage doors too - hadn't taken that into consideration.
Cheers!
Evan
The radio access panel and DF loop are usually the most visible. The G-10 and K are in all other respects very similar. I don't know when the book with the mis-captioned photo was published but such mis-identifications were more frequent in the past.
Cheers
Steve
I'm not with you Milosh. Which image is photoshopped?
The image on your link above (the Eger image) is well known and clearly shows a G-10,ex FE123 now renumbered TE123. Nothing odd there. It is not photoshopped in the link. I'm afraid Green simply misidentified it,not just as a K-6 but as any K at all. It seems that his error was repeated in subsequent publications,again,not unusual.
The FE/TE number has been edited out in the image from 'Die Grossen Luftschlachten des Zweiten Weltkriegs',probably to give the impression that the photo was taken in Germany during the war,though I'm not sure how you'd explain that dreadful fake camouflage or out of period national markings! I assume this is the "photoshopped" image you mean.
Cheers
Steve
The image on your link above (the Eger image) is well known and clearly shows a G-10,ex FE123 now renumbered TE123. Nothing odd there. It is not photoshopped in the link. I'm afraid Green simply misidentified it,not just as a K-6 but as any K at all. It seems that his error was repeated in subsequent publications,again,not unusual.
The FE/TE number has been edited out in the image from 'Die Grossen Luftschlachten des Zweiten Weltkriegs',probably to give the impression that the photo was taken in Germany during the war,though I'm not sure how you'd explain that dreadful fake camouflage or out of period national markings! I assume this is the "photoshopped" image you mean.
Cheers
Steve
