Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Dunno what all the fuss is. I was sitting by my open front door all day shirtless and barefoot...
We're preparing for a heat wave down here, starting Monday 40C or higher through Friday....get them eggs ready to fry Vic!
We're preparing for a heat wave down here, starting Monday 40C or higher through Friday....get them eggs ready to fry Vic!
Hmm, let's seeFirst off, Farenheit shows freezing as 32°, I'm ok with this because anything that says Zero should be both illegal and shot at the same time.
As for the warmer side of farenheit...when it's 100° farenheit, you know the weather is getting serious, in Celsius, it's only 37. That leaves little to the imagination.
On the otherhand, -40° farenheit is the same in Celsius. Why is this, you ask? Because both Farenheit and Celsius agree that -40° below is freakin' cold and not fit for man nor beast.
Farenheit works, Farenheit is good...
Ah, I guess we should also get rid of Celcius. Kelvin it should be. In fact in the lab we used that scale a lot as it is the scientific approach. Very nice, when it is freezing, the temperature is a cosy 273 Kelvin instead of 0C or 32F (don't know how to do degrees-sign on this keyboard). But then again, 40 Kelvin in Australia will be freakin' cold.Marcel, the reasoning behind Fahrenheits scale was basically the same as the metric centrigrade scale, i.e. the elimination of NEGATIVE temperature values. There are rules which apply to negative numbers in mathmatical calculations which are not applicable to temperature. Negative temperatures used in temperature are a DIRECTION or vector quantity. A reading of negative 20 means 20 units below a fixed zero point NOT 20 units less than no units. Therefore Fahrenheit used the coldest temperature obtainable at the time, i.e. the point at which a concentrated brine solution froze as his zero. In the real world temperatures of Below Zero Fahrenheit are not common. Andre Celsius tried the same approach and in his ORIGINAL scale ZERO was the boling point of water and 100C was the freezing point of water. The problem with both scales is that neither man actually knew what temperature is which is why thermometers don't ACTUALLY measure temperature, they measure an effect of temperature change, i.e. the expansion/contraction of matter.
And just in passing, Fahrenheit's actual contribution was a chemical method to clean mercury so that it did not foul the capillary tubes used to make his thermometers