us navy and catapults on carriers

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Capt Spanky

Airman
17
0
Jul 19, 2011
i was reading a lot of old postings on carriers and their usage. one thing that keeps coming up is a prevailing notion that the american carriers were not fitted with catapults untill late in the war.

while the Langley and ranger were built without catapults. the Lexington class had a seaplane pneumatic one which was removed in 1934. all other carriers were built with 2 deck catapults until the super carriers. the Independence class had one catapult and refitted with a second in 44. the escorts were fitted with one or two catapults.

what i did find funny in all my reading was us carrier captains shunned the use of catapults. this is evidenced by the forming up of the launches at midway. amazing they were started to be used once the escorts and light carriers started to be used. another factor was the increased availability of aircraft. the shortened flight desk on the smaller carriers meant that there often was not enough deck space to fly off planes. on a carrier that was designed to carry 100 planes has excess capacity or deck space when it has say 72 planes. now increase that air compliment to 100 and you can see that's 10 more rows of planes taking up deck space. once the ships captains, air boss, and admirals realized you can save gas, extend range and more time over the target, catapult launches became the norm. i believe this was late 1943 or so.
 
Until angled flight decks were introduced it was faster to launch without catapults. I suspect that's the reason catapults were shunned on most WWII era CVs.

An angled flight deck changes the rules as you essentially have two runways (bow and side) and both are equipped with catapults. While one runway is launching the other is preparing for launch.
 
Catapults were deleted during the pre war years because you were also having aircraft entering service with good short field take off ability. Look at the increase in engine development from the time Lexington was built. Additionally I think the main reason why you saw catapults on carriers during this period was to launch seaplanes.
 
On most angled deck carriers i've seen the catapults are on the straight deck portion only, both of them. The angle deck is for landings only.

That way is safer, it keeps landing operations and takeoffs separate, and they can both be operating at the same time.
 
I was thinking more of the early generation angle decks, when they had 2 catapults, both were on the straight deck.

Even on the modern 4 cat. carriers the catapults on the angle deck are pointed straight ahead, not down the angle deck itself.
 
I've seen a picture of a US carrier launching a Wildcat (IIRC) from a side HANGER DECK mounted catapult, parallel to the beam of the ship. What about those? Anybody have info on them? Pre-war only?
 
Impossible. The F4F didn't enter service until 1940.

Perhaps it was an earlier model aircraft in the picture.
 

Must be...

Didn't find a Wildcat launching, but did find a couple of Hellcat pictures... Definately during the war.

F6F_hangar_catapult_USS_Yorktown.jpg


hornet-hangar-catapult-launch.jpg
 
I was thinking more of the early generation angle decks, when they had 2 catapults, both were on the straight deck.

Even on the modern 4 cat. carriers the catapults on the angle deck are pointed straight ahead, not down the angle deck itself.

Yes and no.

A look at the deck layout for CVN 76, Ronald Reagan, shows that while the waist catapults don't exactly follow the centerline of the angled portion of the deck, they're not parallel to the #1 and 2 catapults either. One is almost parallel to the angled portion, the other points more forward.

cvn76.jpg


In 2004, I had the distinct pleasure of spending a week on this ship while testing a deck scrubbing machine prototype. It had just home ported in San Diego. Been there. Got the mug!! :)

small mug.JPG
 
I've wondered about those different angles on the catapults, some carriers have all the catapults at slightly different angles.

It might be to keep the second aircraft launched out of the first aircraft's wake turbuience.
 
Yes and no.

A look at the deck layout for CVN 76, Ronald Reagan, shows that while the waist catapults don't exactly follow the centerline of the angled portion of the deck, they're not parallel to the #1 and 2 catapults either. One is almost parallel to the angled portion, the other points more forward.

View attachment 213204
It appears that none are parallel to the centerline of the ship. I would suspect the design was mainly for deck handling.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back