Who would you choose?

Discussion in 'WW2 General' started by elmilitaro, Aug 22, 2006.

  1. elmilitaro

    elmilitaro Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Messages:
    404
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Occupation:
    College student (getting PhD)
    Location:
    Texas
    All right my good friends I have a question for you all.

    If you were to choose one of these commanders to win a war quick for you and with the least casualties, who would you choose?


    George S. Patton

    Bernard Montgomery

    Erwin Rommel


    WHO?? Explain also why.
     
  2. DerAdlerIstGelandet

    DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crew Chief
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    41,767
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    A&P - Aircraft Technician
    Location:
    USA/Germany
    I would go with Irwin Rommel
     
  3. Joe2

    Joe2 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2006
    Messages:
    295
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Land of hope and Glory
    A tricky one there. I would say Monty as he aimed for low casualties or Patton because he was speedy
     
  4. dutchman

    dutchman Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2013
    Messages:
    61
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    That is a tough question, to get a speedy victory with few casualties is tough duty. Patton could give you speed and Monty would keep casualties low. But to get the balance of both Rommel would be my choice. If I could go off the those three I'd take Bradley.
     
  5. stona

    stona Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2009
    Messages:
    7,515
    Likes Received:
    946
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think winning quickly and with few casualties are mutually exclusive in most scenarios.......sorry.
    Steve
     
  6. davebender

    davebender Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2009
    Messages:
    6,418
    Likes Received:
    64
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Michigan, USA
    A highly regarded infantry officer during 1914. Became a highly regarded mountain warfare officer during 1915 to 1918. Awarded a well deserved Pour le Merit for his leadership at Caporetto.

    Kicked butt while commanding an armored division in 1940 France. Kicked even more butt while commanding Afrika Korps during 1941 to 1943 despite being outnumbered and out gunned most of the time.

    It would be difficult to find another officer so consistently successful in such a wide variety of circumstances and terrain despite being outnumbered most of the time.
     
  7. redcoat

    redcoat Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2004
    Messages:
    420
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Occupation:
    lorry driver
    Location:
    Stockport
    It should be remembered that all were products of their nations armies, and the style of fighting they developed was designed to best suit these armies.
    For example if Rommel was given control of the British army it wouldn't suddenly become as capable of quick reactions to a fluid situation as the German army was in ww2
     
  8. stug3

    stug3 Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2010
    Messages:
    854
    Likes Received:
    53
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    Patton

    1. relentlessly agressive
    2. Loved his job
    3. Told his troops to "make those other bastards die for their country" (or something to that effect)
     
  9. dutchman

    dutchman Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2013
    Messages:
    61
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    I agree with you on the training, but the organization is just as important. The Germans were amoung the first to see tanks as vehicles of attack rather then infantry support. So their organization of units were different from British and French.

    You make a great point about putting Rommel in charge of British forces. Imagine Patton in charge of German forces!
     
  10. DonL

    DonL Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2007
    Messages:
    986
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Occupation:
    IT
    Location:
    Niedersachsen
    1. Monty was an attrition specialist, to me he wasn't very innovative or a man to improvise.
    His style to fight, was in need of circumstances, that his army is stronger and the supply better then his enemy counterpart.

    2. Both Rommel and Patton are very equal, Patton more stronger in logistics, Rommel more stronger at improvisation, both are hot-blooded, tactical very gifted and very popular by their men.

    But honestly to achieve the given task in this thread; I would choose Heinz Guderian, because he combined both strenghts of Rommel and Patton and is a better strategist.
     
  11. Thorlifter

    Thorlifter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2004
    Messages:
    7,905
    Likes Received:
    189
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    IT Nerd
    Location:
    Dallas, Tx Jubail, Saudi Arabia
    I think I'd have to go with Rommel. They didn't call Patton "Ol blood and guts" for nothing. (Our blood, his guts) No doubt Patton could get the job done quickly, but it could be at a heavy cost. If I could pick someone different, I would also go with Omar Bradley.
     
  12. meatloaf109

    meatloaf109 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2012
    Messages:
    6,688
    Likes Received:
    252
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Occupation:
    plumbing "pro" at Lowes in Franklin N.C.
    Location:
    north carolina
    Ah, the "G.I. " general.
    Rommel was also known as a man who would try to spare the lives of his men.
    He gets my vote.
    Monty tried too hard, and sometimes sacrificed more than necessary.
    Patton. Well, ..... A brilliant tactician and a leader, but one could hardly call him conservative of lives.
     
  13. redcoat

    redcoat Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2004
    Messages:
    420
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Occupation:
    lorry driver
    Location:
    Stockport
    #13 redcoat, Aug 26, 2013
    Last edited: Aug 26, 2013
    I've often wondered why Bradley was given this title as some of his campaigns were noted for high infantry casualties, the early battles in Normandy and the bloodbath that was the Hurtgen Forest are ones that come to mind.
    While not a butcher, he did drive his men to their limits, and they suffered considerably due to his unwilliness to accept logistical realities.
     
Loading...

Share This Page