Who would you want to design your fighter - 1943 (2 Viewers)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

NevadaK

Senior Airman
407
651
Oct 10, 2019
Greetings All,

Let's say its June, 1943 and you are planning the development of a new single engine fighter. For the sake of valuing skill and talent assume that the designer of your choice will not be limited by shortages created by the war or a nation's inability to develop an engine. For instance, imagine what someone like Tomio Kubo could have done if designing in America instead of Japan. You have six months to first flight.

Who you gonna call?
 
Sorry to complicate things, but do you want to place an order for an entirely new fighter in 1943, expecting it to enter service subsequently or do you want your fighter to enter service in 1943? Yup, I'm complicating things, but the two questions can have very different answers. The former means you can look at jet designs, which in 1943 the options were limited but technology and knowledge within a year were expanding, so choose your framer for example and then your powerplant manufacturer.

The latter extends the search for a designer a little more of course...

This was flying in prototype form in 1943.

49069318892_da9c0458b1_b.jpg
Me 262

So was this.

49262413291_8ffbce0486_b.jpg
El Aeroparque 14
 
Sorry to complicate things, but do you want to place an order for an entirely new fighter in 1943, expecting it to enter service subsequently or do you want your fighter to enter service in 1943? Yup, I'm complicating things, but the two questions can have very different answers. The former means you can look at jet designs, which in 1943 the options were limited but technology and knowledge within a year were expanding, so choose your framer for example and then your powerplant manufacturer.

The latter extends the search for a designer a little more of course...
You are ordering a new fighter in 1943 to enter service subsequently.
 
Greetings All,

Let's say its June, 1943 and you are planning the development of a new single engine fighter. For the sake of valuing skill and talent assume that the designer of your choice will not be limited by shortages created by the war or a nation's inability to develop an engine. For instance, imagine what someone like Tomio Kubo could have done if designing in America instead of Japan. You have six months to first flight.

Who you gonna call?
By June 1943 initiation and first flight early 1944 I'm focused on postwar. I want the Horten brothers or the likes of the Kyushu J7W Shinden's Massaoki Tsuruno.
 
This response is why I created the question. If the P-51 Mustang didn't get the merlin would we think of Edgar Schmued in the same way? Probably not.
Edgar Schmued is basically unknown, apart by the aircraft history aficionados. They can note him as a person behind the Sabre and F-5, apart from Mustang. Looks like a successful career to me.
 
Ahem - Sydney Camm of Hawker would like a word.

A few credits include the Hurricane, Typhoon (with caveats), Tempest, Sea Fury, Hunter and the Kestrel/Harrier family. Not too many duff fighters in the family line (don't mention the Tornado) and the company handled the jump from props to jets quite capably. Many other companies were killed off in that process.

If I were wanting either an ultimate superprop (which is what a 1943 design is going to end up as) or an early subsonic jet I'd probably put my money on Hawker being able to deliver.

DH come a close second but until the Vampire single-seat fighters were not really their thing. Would you know this in 1943 based on their main party piece of the time (Mossie)?
 
Ahem - Sydney Camm of Hawker would like a word. A few credits include the Hurricane, Typhoon (with caveats), Tempest, Sea Fury, Hunter and the Kestrel/Harrier family.
Interestingly, nothing from Hawker ever broke the sound barrier…..unless we count the Avro Arrow, produced by an offshore unit of Hawker-Siddeley. Hawker's postwar fighters were slugs (and often very late to the party, taking many years from ideation to service entry) compared to what the Soviets and Americans were able to accomplish with their British-derived jet engines. Even the postwar French were fielding better aircraft than Hawker.

As for WW2, not designing the Typhoon with sufficient tail structure seems a mistake not worthy of top rated firm.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back