Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
In my view, Eisenhower gets the nod. Anybody that could subordinate(mostly)those massive egos of his subordinates deserves my vote.
You would probably want Churchill running your country but Eisenhower running your military to bring about victory, but not the other way round
Churchill had heart, a great wartime leader.
Eisenhower had the perfect temperment for a General. Patton was definantly Eisenhower's best General. Bradley and Monty were just too cautious and slow too act. I really don't know how Monty kept his job. I am also not a big fan of MacArthur. Nimitz was better.
I am surprised that the great US adminstrators are not on the list.......Nimitz, and Marshal in particular. These men were the architects of the US victory.
Agreed and Hap Arnold fits there also.
For the British I would like to see Mountbatten and Slim for their efforts in India and Burma, and Cunningham for his efforts in the Med. O'Connor would have done great things if he not been captured.
In the Pacific, the great US leader was Macarthur. The man has his faults, but he was able to forge together a wartime alliance with the Australians that persists to this day. In a sense it is the most enduring legacy of the war....the forging of the alliances that preserved the western way of life
Marshall is on the list, Parsifal. As I mentioned, he picked Ike for Supreme Command - and put Europe back together quick enough to check Stalin.
To me, by WW2 FDR's strength came from his delegates. I have enormous admiration for Zhukov - from the Japanese in May-Sept '39 to Berlin '45. He was a master of logistics as well as strategy.
What impresses me most about MacArthur is the re-build of Japan. And likewise, great respect for Truman for plain spoken leadership both as VP and POTUS when the 2 Allied bombs were deployed.
But soldiers shape both the battle and the peace - and George Marshall as military leader and Churchill as political leader would be my choice.
MM
Recent threads have provoked strong feelings about which ally made the greatest contribution in WW2. While fighting strength and industrial output were critical, leadership was also vital. Who is the greatest WW2 military and non political leader for the Allied Cause?
Political Leaders:
Churchill
Roosevelt
Stalin
Tito
Truman
Military Leaders:
Wondering members thoughts on this.
MM
In my view, Eisenhower gets the nod. Anybody that could subordinate(mostly)those massive egos of his subordinates deserves my vote.
Great point. Understood power and used it very wisely. Plan to defeat the Nazis was good. Went to a stregth of the Allies they could not hope to match.
Eisenhower had the perfect temperment for a General. Patton was definantly Eisenhower's best General. Bradley and Monty were just too cautious and slow too act. I really don't know how Monty kept his job. I am also not a big fan of MacArthur. Nimitz was better.
Churchill had heart, a great wartime leader.
I rank Churchill as one of the greatest leaders of all time...
I guess Ike probably deserves the title for Allied military commanders, but there were quite a few good ones out there.
I am surprised that the great US adminstrators are not on the list.......Nimitz, and Marshal in particular. These men were the architects of the US victory.
Marshall is on the list, Parsifal. As I mentioned, he picked Ike for Supreme Command - and put Europe back together quick enough to check Stalin.
But soldiers shape both the battle and the peace - and George Marshall as military leader and Churchill as political leader would be my choice.
MM