Hi,
I'm wondering what source you used to find out this information:
"Divebombing as a technique also proved very vulnerable to flak. Whereas the average ammunition expenditure to bring down a High Level Heavy Bomber in 1944 was around 16000 shells per kill, to bring down a Divebomber, the ammunition expenditure for the allies was somthing less than 1500 rounds per kill. Fighter Bombers were somewhat less prone to flak damage, at around 6000 rounds per kill."
From this thread: http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/aviation/dive-bombing-improves-accuracy-how-much-22587.html
Thanks
I'm wondering what source you used to find out this information:
"Divebombing as a technique also proved very vulnerable to flak. Whereas the average ammunition expenditure to bring down a High Level Heavy Bomber in 1944 was around 16000 shells per kill, to bring down a Divebomber, the ammunition expenditure for the allies was somthing less than 1500 rounds per kill. Fighter Bombers were somewhat less prone to flak damage, at around 6000 rounds per kill."
From this thread: http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/aviation/dive-bombing-improves-accuracy-how-much-22587.html
Thanks