Any Aircraft

• Mar 10, 2006

• #21

loomaluftwaffe

Tech Sergeant

1,840

0

Dec 20, 2005

MacArther said:

Yes, there would be extreme torque with the I-16 typ 24, but that could be rectified with the proper trim of the airleons (spl?) and possibly adding armor or other weights (such as guns or more ammo) could also solve this problem.

Click to expand...

and what about the fuel? a tubby little plane wont hold enough good fuel for such a hungry 2000hp engine

 

• Mar 10, 2006

• #22

MacArther

Staff Sergeant

1,264

10

Sep 19, 2005

Phoenix, AZ

www.edge-gamers.com

Ok, in lieu of the armor or more ammo, we substitute more fuel and give it drop tanks.

 

• Mar 10, 2006

• #23

loomaluftwaffe

Tech Sergeant

1,840

0

Dec 20, 2005

when you get into a fight and drop it, you will run out of fuel

 

• Mar 11, 2006

• #24

the lancaster kicks ass

Major General

19,931

17

Dec 20, 2003

heck we're making up our own planes here, i don't think the issue of how realistic our fuel consumption is is our main concern when it comes to accuracy

 

• Mar 11, 2006

• #25

loomaluftwaffe

Tech Sergeant

1,840

0

Dec 20, 2005

do you really have bad spelling or was it a typo?

 

• Mar 11, 2006

• #26

the lancaster kicks ass

Major General

19,931

17

Dec 20, 2003

yes, it was a typo, and i don't believe you have any right to comment on my English........

 

• Mar 11, 2006

• #27

loomaluftwaffe

Tech Sergeant

1,840

0

Dec 20, 2005

why not?

 

• Mar 11, 2006

• #28

the lancaster kicks ass

Major General

19,931

17

Dec 20, 2003

well, for a start i AM English

 

• Mar 11, 2006

• #29

loomaluftwaffe

Tech Sergeant

1,840

0

Dec 20, 2005

and the fact that your 3 yrs older than me? sorry cause i've had too much english class cause its almost my exams

 

• Mar 14, 2006

• #30

MacArther

Staff Sergeant

1,264

10

Sep 19, 2005

Phoenix, AZ

www.edge-gamers.com

A F190 D with a 2000 hourse power engine, and maybe more guns.

 

• Mar 14, 2006

• #31

J

Jabberwocky

Tech Sergeant

1,504

1,436

Jul 24, 2005

Australia

The 109D did have a 2000 hp engine. The Jumo 213A on the D-9 was rated to 2100 PS with MW-50 boost (40 min worth @ 10 minutes maximum) and the Jumo 213F on the D-12 was rated to 2050 PS with MW-50.

And if you wan't more guns, the D-12 had a Mk 108 30mm cannon and 2 MG 151/20s. The D-13 had 3 20mms.

 

• Mar 14, 2006

• #32

Soren

1st Lieutenant

6,457

28

Feb 6, 2005

And with C3 fuel it was 2100 + PS, and coupled with a compressor it was 2240 PS.

 

• Mar 14, 2006

• #33

MacArther

Staff Sergeant

1,264

10

Sep 19, 2005

Phoenix, AZ

www.edge-gamers.com

my bad, I thought it was a 1900 hp engine.

 

• Mar 15, 2006

• #34

loomaluftwaffe

Tech Sergeant

1,840

0

Dec 20, 2005

the 213 is 1,750hp without MW 50, but becomes 2,050hp when booted with MW 50

 

• Mar 24, 2006

• #35

Soren

1st Lieutenant

6,457

28

Feb 6, 2005

Normal takeoff: 1,755 PS
Takeoff w/ increased boost pressure : 1,900 PS (Start u. Notleistung)
Emergency w/ MW50 and B4: 2,100 PS. (Notleistung mit MW50)
Special emergency w/ MW50 and C3: 2,100 + PS (Sonder Notleistung)
Special emergency w/ Compressor, C3 and MW50: 2,240 PS (Sonder Notleistung mit A Lader als Bodenmotor)

 

Attachments

• jumo213a1_156.jpg

  86.6 KB · Views: 127

• Mar 24, 2006

• #36

loomaluftwaffe

Tech Sergeant

1,840

0

Dec 20, 2005

nice chart

 

• Mar 25, 2006

• Thread starter
• #37

S

schwarzpanzer

Senior Airman

662

2

Aug 8, 2005

Looking at he Buchon and P40, then at the Mustang; I wonder, could the outer 2 .50's have been made to fire through the propellor? - and maybe an extra hub-mounter for good luck?

BTW loomaluftwaffe, there's nothing wrong with my English - my keyboard however is another matter!