B-17 Tokyo Tanks

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Hoggardhigh

Airman 1st Class
225
45
Jan 6, 2014
United States
Hi all,
Regarding production of the B-17 series, it is my knowledge that additional outer wing fuel tanks, known as " Tokyo Tanks," were fitted at the factories beginning with later B-17F production.
I have one question: could ALL B-17E thru G models accomodate these tanks?

Thanks
 
The wing tanks were factory installed and were standard in the late F and G models. Probably not retrofitted in earlier production a/c.
E models could be fitted with one or two 410 gallon ferry tanks in the bomb bay, but each took up 1/2 of the bomb bay. Early versions were unprotected, but later ones were self-sealing.
 
Tokyo tanks = engineers found a way to convert unused space in wings to fuel tanks.
Probably paired with minimizing effect on production to not cause a loss (even if it's just temporary).
 
Getting back to the original question, a few paragraphs from the B-17F & G manual may be instructive.

1. MAXIMUM LOAD
(a) B-17F airplanes, with modified landing gear
and added cord-wise wing tiptanks, can be flown up to
and including a gross weight of 64,500 pounds with
the following restrictions.

(b) At 64,500 pounds the extra wing tip tanks
must be full to obtain the effect of a relieving load on
the wings in flight. Care must be exercised in taxying
avoiding rough ground. Take-offs, above a gross weight
of 56,000 pounds may only be made on smooth fields
or prepared runways. All pivot turns on one wheel,
while taxying, will be avoided.

(c) All B-17 type aircraft, equipped with the extra
wing tip cord-wise tanks, must be operated in accordance
with (b) preceding, whenever the wing tip tanks are more
than half full. Maximum permissible indicated airspeed of
B-17F airplanes, with extra wing tip tanks full, must be
limited to 230 mph, when loaded to 64,500lbs. Maximum
maneuver permissible at 64,500lbs; positive 2.056; negative 1.22;
landing gear, 2.1.

Now I take that as without the modified landing gear fitting the wingtip tanks to a B-17E in the field is pretty much going to be a waste of time as the overloaded airplane stands a good chance of breaking/collapsing the landing gear in less than perfect conditions.
There were 512 B-17Es built compared to 3405 B-17Fs (not all of which got the tip tanks/beefed up landing gear) and 4035 B-17Gs. Number of "E"s in service when surplus Toyko tanks became available in repair centers over and above replacements for active B-17Fs and Gs would be pretty small.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back