The Carbine is 5.56mm, which isn't a "pistol bullet".
It was actually 7.62mm, maybe you're thinking of the Ruger Mini-14?
Here is info and a pic of the bullet next to a 5.56 round:
http://world.guns.ru/rifle/rfl08-e.htm
It was worse than a .45 ACP IMHO, but had its uses (like the Colt M4A1/Commando, only worse)
Yes, the Garand was reliable, I'll give it that.
The Thompson was hard to control with a definate swing.
Its not that bad accuracy-wise, heavy and noisy though...
The SMLE was the best bolt action rifle but the Semi Automatic was a massive improvement for combat.
The 'mad minute' gave it a higher RoF than the Garand! 8)
In a hand to hand situation the bolt action was not viable, you had one shot and then the only real alternative was to hit them with it.
Or give them 18 inches of steel!
I prefer the carbine for its magazine capacity and the lack of combat limitations over the M1.
Thats partly why I like the M1928A1 over the M1A1 'Tommy'.
I think all SMG's had pistol bullets
Your absolutely right, the M1 Carbine, Mauser Schnellfeur and modern Colt M4A1/Commando are debatable though...
the MP40 was reliable and for an SMG accurate.
Yes, but the PPSh41 beats it on those points, the Tommy matches it. I wouldn't say it was that accurate IMHO, in fact only really the Sten was worse?
For this I almost chose a revolver over the Colt 1911, but the extra capacity won me over.
Yes, good point, but the Colt is built like an AK-47, it will work every time!
Also, save for WW1 Webleys Chinese Schnellfeurs, it was the most powerful sidearm and those 2 weren't that reliable.
Not too accurate or comfortable, but that didn't matter point-blank!
It can jump out your hand or injure it though.